Diagnosis and management of cases of suspected dermatomycosis in The Netherlands: influence of general practice based potassium hydroxide testing.

BACKGROUND

Microscopy of a potassium hydroxide preparation of skin scrapings or nail clippings, although widely advocated as a test for dermatomycosis, is used in only a small proportion of cases.

OBJECTIVE

This study set out to investigate the effect of potassium hydroxide testing on the subjectively assessed probability that a dermatomycosis was present.

METHODS

The study was undertaken in 1992 in Limburg, a province in the south of the Netherlands. Ten general practitioners and eight trainees completed a questionnaire and performed a potassium hydroxide preparation for each patient presenting with a skin condition that they thought might be caused by dermatomycosis. Skin or nail material was also sent to a microbiology laboratory where another potassium hydroxide preparation as well as a culture were performed, these two tests serving as a gold standard against which to judge the potassium hydroxide preparation by the general practitioners. Data from a total of 164 cases were analysed.

RESULTS

The results of the potassium hydroxide test carried out in the practice had a considerable influence on the subjectively assessed probability that a dermatomycosis was present, especially if the outcome was positive. The indication for antifungal treatment was altered as a result of the test in a quarter of all cases, mostly from negative to positive. Use of the practice potassium hydroxide test could increase the proportion of correct therapeutic decisions from 54% to 69%, with 20% of cases being undertreated. Of cases that gave a positive test result in the practice 83% also had a positive laboratory test result, while of cases that gave a negative practice result 43% were positive in the laboratory.

CONCLUSIONS

The potassium hydroxide test improves the diagnostic process in cases of possible dermatomycosis and may result in a change in management. The test can provide a confirmation of the diagnosis of dermatomycosis but is not useful in the exclusion of this diagnosis.