Arabic
Albanian
Arabic
Armenian
Azerbaijani
Belarusian
Bengali
Bosnian
Catalan
Czech
Danish
Deutsch
Dutch
English
Estonian
Finnish
Français
Greek
Haitian Creole
Hebrew
Hindi
Hungarian
Icelandic
Indonesian
Irish
Italian
Japanese
Korean
Latvian
Lithuanian
Macedonian
Mongolian
Norwegian
Persian
Polish
Portuguese
Romanian
Russian
Serbian
Slovak
Slovenian
Spanish
Swahili
Swedish
Turkish
Ukrainian
Vietnamese
Български
中文(简体)
中文(繁體)
Surgery 1999-May

Gastric symptoms and duodenogastric reflux in patients referred for gastroesophageal reflux symptoms and endoscopic esophagitis.

يمكن للمستخدمين المسجلين فقط ترجمة المقالات
الدخول التسجيل فى الموقع
يتم حفظ الارتباط في الحافظة
R Romagnoli
J M Collard
P Bechi
M Salizzoni

الكلمات الدالة

نبذة مختصرة

BACKGROUND

The role of excessive duodenogastric reflux (DRG) in the genesis of gastric symptoms in patients primarily referred for both gastroesophageal reflux (GER) symptoms and esophagitis is poorly understood.

METHODS

The study is based on the clinical, endoscopic, histologic, and 24-hour gastric data from the Bilitec optoelectronic device (Prodotec, Florence, Italy, licensed by Synectics Medical, Stockholm, Sweden) from 49 patients having both typical GER symptoms and gastric symptoms suggestive of excessive DGR (i.e., epigastric pain, nausea, or bilious vomiting) in the absence of previous esophageal or gastric surgery (group 1). Helicobacter pylori organisms were searched for on antral biopsy specimens with use of the Giemsa method. The percentages of total, upright, and supine time during which absorbance exceeded various thresholds through all the working range of the Bilitec device were calculated. Bilitec data from group 1 were compared with those from 16 patients with endoscopic esophagitis and GER symptoms only (group 2) and 25 healthy subjects (group 3).

RESULTS

The prevalence of an abnormal Bilitec test result in group 1 increased from 27% (13/49) at the 0.25 absorbance threshold to 36% (18/49) at thresholds ranging from 0.40 to 0.60 and to 41% (20/49) when multiple thresholds ranging from 0.25 to 0.60 were considered. In group 2 one patient had an abnormal Bilitec test result at the 0.25 to 0.30 threshold, whereas the other 15 patients had a normal test result. H pylori antral infection was present in 14 group 1 patients. None of these had an abnormal Bilitec test result, whereas the test was positive in 40% of the H pylori-negative patients without endoscopic gastritis and in 70% of H pylori-negative patients with endoscopic gastritis (P = .001).

CONCLUSIONS

Twenty-four-hour intragastric bile monitoring provides the clinician with unequivocal evidence of excessive DGR in 41% of patients with an intact stomach having endoscopic esophagitis, GER symptoms, and gastric symptoms suggestive of DGR. The most dependable data are obtained when absorbance thresholds higher than 0.40 are considered. H pylori antral infection and excessive DGR at 24-hour intragastric bile monitoring are mutually exclusive.

انضم إلى صفحتنا على الفيسبوك

قاعدة بيانات الأعشاب الطبية الأكثر اكتمالا التي يدعمها العلم

  • يعمل في 55 لغة
  • العلاجات العشبية مدعومة بالعلم
  • التعرف على الأعشاب بالصورة
  • خريطة GPS تفاعلية - ضع علامة على الأعشاب في الموقع (قريبًا)
  • اقرأ المنشورات العلمية المتعلقة ببحثك
  • البحث عن الأعشاب الطبية من آثارها
  • نظّم اهتماماتك وابقَ على اطلاع دائم بأبحاث الأخبار والتجارب السريرية وبراءات الاختراع

اكتب أحد الأعراض أو المرض واقرأ عن الأعشاب التي قد تساعد ، واكتب عشبًا واطلع على الأمراض والأعراض التي تستخدم ضدها.
* تستند جميع المعلومات إلى البحوث العلمية المنشورة

Google Play badgeApp Store badge