Arabic
Albanian
Arabic
Armenian
Azerbaijani
Belarusian
Bengali
Bosnian
Catalan
Czech
Danish
Deutsch
Dutch
English
Estonian
Finnish
Français
Greek
Haitian Creole
Hebrew
Hindi
Hungarian
Icelandic
Indonesian
Irish
Italian
Japanese
Korean
Latvian
Lithuanian
Macedonian
Mongolian
Norwegian
Persian
Polish
Portuguese
Romanian
Russian
Serbian
Slovak
Slovenian
Spanish
Swahili
Swedish
Turkish
Ukrainian
Vietnamese
Български
中文(简体)
中文(繁體)
Clinical Infectious Diseases 1997-Feb

Results of a randomized, multicenter trial of meropenem versus clindamycin/tobramycin for the treatment of intra-abdominal infections.

يمكن للمستخدمين المسجلين فقط ترجمة المقالات
الدخول التسجيل فى الموقع
يتم حفظ الارتباط في الحافظة
S E Wilson

الكلمات الدالة

نبذة مختصرة

In a randomized, double-blind clinical trial conducted at 13 medical centers, meropenem (1,000 mg given iv every 8 hours) was compared with the combination of clindamycin (900 mg every 8 hours) plus tobramycin (5 mg/[kg.d] in three divided doses) given iv for the treatment of intra-abdominal infections that required surgery and parenteral antibiotic therapy. At the end of treatment, efficacy data on patients who met study inclusion criteria (intent-to-treat) were available for 132 of 215 patients in the meropenem group and 134 of 212 patients in the clindamycin/tobramycin group; 120 (91%) of 132 intent-to-treat patients in the meropenem group were cured, 115 (86%) of 134 intent-to-treat patients in the clindamycin/tobramycin group were cured (P value, not significant). Of the patients treated with meropenem and considered evaluable according to the study protocol, 89 (92%) of 97 were cured, and 81 (86%) of 94 patients treated with clindamycin/tobramycin and considered evaluable were cured. Bacteriologic response rates for all evaluable patients (n = 191) were 96% (93 of 97 patients) among those randomized to the meropenem arm and 93% (87 of 94) among those randomized to the clindamycin/tobramycin arm. Adverse events occurred with similar frequency in both treatment groups; neither seizures nor deaths related to treatment were reported for any patients in either group. The results of this trial demonstrated that meropenem, together with appropriate surgical intervention, was safe and effective in the treatment of patients who had bacterial intra-abdominal infections, most of which were secondary to complicated appendicitis.

انضم إلى صفحتنا على الفيسبوك

قاعدة بيانات الأعشاب الطبية الأكثر اكتمالا التي يدعمها العلم

  • يعمل في 55 لغة
  • العلاجات العشبية مدعومة بالعلم
  • التعرف على الأعشاب بالصورة
  • خريطة GPS تفاعلية - ضع علامة على الأعشاب في الموقع (قريبًا)
  • اقرأ المنشورات العلمية المتعلقة ببحثك
  • البحث عن الأعشاب الطبية من آثارها
  • نظّم اهتماماتك وابقَ على اطلاع دائم بأبحاث الأخبار والتجارب السريرية وبراءات الاختراع

اكتب أحد الأعراض أو المرض واقرأ عن الأعشاب التي قد تساعد ، واكتب عشبًا واطلع على الأمراض والأعراض التي تستخدم ضدها.
* تستند جميع المعلومات إلى البحوث العلمية المنشورة

Google Play badgeApp Store badge