Successful preemptive cidofovir treatment for CMV antigenemia after dose-reduced conditioning and allogeneic blood stem cell transplantation.

BACKGROUND

Cidofovir (CDV) is a nucleotide analogue with proven in vitro effects against cytomegalovirus (CMV) and adenovirus and has been successfully used in the treatment of CMV retinitis in AIDS patients.

METHODS

We performed a prospective study to evaluate the efficacy of CDV in 17 patients with hematological malignancies after allogeneic blood stem cell transplantation from related (n=3) and unrelated (n=14) donors. Dose-reduced conditioning (DRC) regimen consisted of busulfan (Bu)/fludarabine (Flu) (n=9) and idarubicin/cytosine arabinoside/Flu (n=1). Myeloablative conditioning (MC) was performed with Bu/cyclophosphamide (Cy)/etoposide (Eto) (n=4), Bu/Cy (n=2), and total body irradiation (TBI)/Cy/Eto (n=1). Antithymocyte globulin (ATG) was used in seven patients with DRC and in six patients with MC. In all patients, either the donor, host, or both were CMV IgG positive pretransplant. Indication for therapy was preemptive treatment of primary CMV antigenemia defined as two consecutive positive tests of pp65 antigenemia assay after transplant. In case of response with a decreasing number of pp65-positive leukocytes, CDV was scheduled in a dosage of 5 mg/kg body weight once a week for 2 weeks followed by maintenance therapy every 2 weeks in an outpatient setting. All patients received probenecid and prehydration as recommended. Patients were monitored using an immunostaining assay for pp65 antigen and a qualitative and quantitative CMV polymerase chain reaction (PCR). Success of treatment was defined as negativity for the pp65 antigen.

RESULTS

After DRC, nine of ten patients (90%) showed a response with seven of nine revealing a complete clearance of the virus (pp65 negative, qualitative PCR negative). In the remaining two responders, treatment was changed to ganciclovir because of either renal impairment or slow clearance of antigenemia. Only one of seven patients in the MC group experienced a temporary clearance of pp65 antigen. After MC, two patients experienced CMV disease. Treatment-related toxicity rate was moderate with four patients developing reversible renal impairment (creatinine 133-180 micromol/L); one patient with proteinuria and three patients with complaints of nausea and vomiting.

CONCLUSIONS

Our data suggest the feasibility of CDV administration in patients after allogeneic transplantation. In the recommended dose, it might be used successfully for low-risk patients, e.g., after DRC or organ transplantation, in an outpatient setting.