Arabic
Albanian
Arabic
Armenian
Azerbaijani
Belarusian
Bengali
Bosnian
Catalan
Czech
Danish
Deutsch
Dutch
English
Estonian
Finnish
Français
Greek
Haitian Creole
Hebrew
Hindi
Hungarian
Icelandic
Indonesian
Irish
Italian
Japanese
Korean
Latvian
Lithuanian
Macedonian
Mongolian
Norwegian
Persian
Polish
Portuguese
Romanian
Russian
Serbian
Slovak
Slovenian
Spanish
Swahili
Swedish
Turkish
Ukrainian
Vietnamese
Български
中文(简体)
中文(繁體)
Current Eye Research 2014-Sep

Tonometry in corneal edema after cataract surgery: rebound versus goldmann applanation tonometry.

يمكن للمستخدمين المسجلين فقط ترجمة المقالات
الدخول التسجيل فى الموقع
يتم حفظ الارتباط في الحافظة
Matthias Fuest
Nikolaos Mamas
Peter Walter
Niklas Plange

الكلمات الدالة

نبذة مختصرة

OBJECTIVE

Goldmann applanation tonometry (GAT) is known to be influenced by corneal properties, whereas the effect of corneal edema on intraocular pressure (IOP) measurement using Rebound tonometry (RT) is not clear. In this study, IOP was measured before and after cataract surgery using GAT and RT to investigate differences between methods and the effect of postsurgical corneal edema.

METHODS

Thirty patients with cataract were included in a prospective study. IOP was measured using GAT and RT (Icare PRO, Tiolat Oy, Finland) before and after one day of phacoemulsification. Central corneal thickness (CCT) was determined before and after surgery (Pentacam, Oculus, Germany).

RESULTS

CCT increased significantly after surgery by 52.2 ± 35.1 µm (p < 0.0001). IOP values of GAT and RT were significantly correlated before surgery (r = 0.65, p < 0.0001) and after surgery (r = 0.94, p < 0.0001). No significant correlation of GAT and RT to CCT before surgery (GAT: r = 0.18, p = 0.36; RT: r = 0.03, p = 0.87) or after surgery (GAT: r = -0.08, p = 0.69; RT: r = 0.17, p = 0.37) was found. The mean difference between GAT and RT (GAT-RT) was -1.0 ± 2.9 mmHg (range -6.2 to 6.4 mmHg, p = 0.08) before surgery and -1.1 ± 2.2 mmHg (range -5.1 to 4.8 mmHg, p = 0.01) after surgery. Before surgery, a positive correlation of GAT-RT with mean IOP of both methods is apparent (r = 0.45, p = 0.01). After surgery, no such correlation was found (r = -0.08, p = 0.69).

CONCLUSIONS

RT underestimates IOP in higher values and overestimates IOP in lower values compared to GAT before surgery. This is not apparent in eyes with corneal edema. Large differences between methods may be present in individual patients with and without corneal edema.

انضم إلى صفحتنا على الفيسبوك

قاعدة بيانات الأعشاب الطبية الأكثر اكتمالا التي يدعمها العلم

  • يعمل في 55 لغة
  • العلاجات العشبية مدعومة بالعلم
  • التعرف على الأعشاب بالصورة
  • خريطة GPS تفاعلية - ضع علامة على الأعشاب في الموقع (قريبًا)
  • اقرأ المنشورات العلمية المتعلقة ببحثك
  • البحث عن الأعشاب الطبية من آثارها
  • نظّم اهتماماتك وابقَ على اطلاع دائم بأبحاث الأخبار والتجارب السريرية وبراءات الاختراع

اكتب أحد الأعراض أو المرض واقرأ عن الأعشاب التي قد تساعد ، واكتب عشبًا واطلع على الأمراض والأعراض التي تستخدم ضدها.
* تستند جميع المعلومات إلى البحوث العلمية المنشورة

Google Play badgeApp Store badge