Belarusian
Albanian
Arabic
Armenian
Azerbaijani
Belarusian
Bengali
Bosnian
Catalan
Czech
Danish
Deutsch
Dutch
English
Estonian
Finnish
Français
Greek
Haitian Creole
Hebrew
Hindi
Hungarian
Icelandic
Indonesian
Irish
Italian
Japanese
Korean
Latvian
Lithuanian
Macedonian
Mongolian
Norwegian
Persian
Polish
Portuguese
Romanian
Russian
Serbian
Slovak
Slovenian
Spanish
Swahili
Swedish
Turkish
Ukrainian
Vietnamese
Български
中文(简体)
中文(繁體)
Journal of Biosciences 2011-Mar

HrpN Ea-induced deterrent effect on phloem feeding of the green peach aphid Myzus persicae requires AtGSL5 and AtMYB44 genes in Arabidopsis thaliana.

Перакладаць артыкулы могуць толькі зарэгістраваныя карыстальнікі
Увайсці / Зарэгістравацца
Спасылка захоўваецца ў буферы абмену
Beibei Lü
Weiwei Sun
Shuping Zhang
Chunling Zhang
Jun Qian
Xiaomeng Wang
Rong Gao
Hansong Dong

Ключавыя словы

Рэферат

In Arabidopsis thaliana (Arabidopsis) treated with the harpin protein HrpN Ea, resistance to the green peach aphid Myzus persicae, a generalist phloem-feeding insect, develops with induced expression of the AtMYB44 gene. Special GLUCAN SYNTHESIS-LIKE (GSL) genes and beta-1,3-glucan callose play an important role in plant defence responses to attacks by phloem-feeding insects. Here we report that AtGLS5 and AtMYB44 are both required for Hrp Ea-induced repression of M. persicae feeding from the phloem of Arabidopsis leaves. In 24 h successive surveys on large-scale aphid populations, the proportion of feeding aphids was much smaller in HrpN Ea-treated plants than in control plants, and aphids preferred to feed from the 37 tested atgsl mutants rather than the wild-type plant. The atgsl mutants were generated previously by mutagenesis in 12 identified AtGSL genes (AtGSL1 through AtGSL12); in the 24 h survey, both atgsl5 and atgsl6 tolerated aphid feeding, and atgsl5 was the most tolerant. Consistently, atgsl5 was also most inhibitive to the deterrent effect of HrpN Ea on the phloem-feeding activity of aphids as monitored by the electrical penetration graph technique. These results suggested an important role of the AtGSL5 gene in the effect of HrpN Ea. In response to HrpN Ea, AtGSL5 expression and callose deposition were induced in the wild-type plant but not in atgsl5. In response to HrpN Ea, moreover, the AtMYB44 gene known to be required for repression of aphid reproduction on the plant was also required for repression of the phloem-feeding activity. Small amounts of the AtGSL5 transcript and callose deposition were detected in the atmyb44 mutant, as in atgsl5. Both mutants performed similarly in tolerating the phloem-feeding activity and impairing the deterrent effect of HrpN Ea, suggesting that AtGSL5 and AtMYB44 both contributed to the effect.

Далучайцеся да нашай
старонкі ў facebook

Самая поўная база дадзеных пра лекавыя травы, падтрыманая навукай

  • Працуе на 55 мовах
  • Лячэнне травой пры падтрымцы навукі
  • Распазнаванне траў па малюнку
  • Інтэрактыўная GPS-карта - пазначце травы па месцы (хутка)
  • Чытайце навуковыя публікацыі, звязаныя з вашым пошукам
  • Шукайце лекавыя зёлкі па іх уздзеянні
  • Арганізуйце свае інтарэсы і будзьце ў курсе навінавых даследаванняў, клінічных выпрабаванняў і патэнтаў

Увядзіце сімптом альбо захворванне і прачытайце пра зёлкі, якія могуць дапамагчы, набярыце траву і паглядзіце хваробы і сімптомы, супраць якіх яна выкарыстоўваецца.
* Уся інфармацыя заснавана на апублікаваных навуковых даследаваннях

Google Play badgeApp Store badge