Belarusian
Albanian
Arabic
Armenian
Azerbaijani
Belarusian
Bengali
Bosnian
Catalan
Czech
Danish
Deutsch
Dutch
English
Estonian
Finnish
Français
Greek
Haitian Creole
Hebrew
Hindi
Hungarian
Icelandic
Indonesian
Irish
Italian
Japanese
Korean
Latvian
Lithuanian
Macedonian
Mongolian
Norwegian
Persian
Polish
Portuguese
Romanian
Russian
Serbian
Slovak
Slovenian
Spanish
Swahili
Swedish
Turkish
Ukrainian
Vietnamese
Български
中文(简体)
中文(繁體)
Vaccine 2017-Aug

Tularemia vaccine: Safety, reactogenicity, "Take" skin reactions, and antibody responses following vaccination with a new lot of the Francisella tularensis live vaccine strain - A phase 2 randomized clinical Trial.

Перакладаць артыкулы могуць толькі зарэгістраваныя карыстальнікі
Увайсці / Зарэгістравацца
Спасылка захоўваецца ў буферы абмену
Mark J Mulligan
Jack T Stapleton
Wendy A Keitel
Sharon E Frey
Wilbur H Chen
Nadine Rouphael
Srilatha Edupuganti
Allison Beck
Patricia L Winokur
Hana M El Sahly

Ключавыя словы

Рэферат

Tularemia is caused by Francisella tularensis, a gram-negative bacterium that has been weaponized as an aerosol. For protection of personnel conducting biodefense research, the United States Army required clinical evaluation of a new lot of tularemia live vaccine strain manufactured in accordance with Current Good Manufacturing Practices.

A phase 2 randomized clinical trial compared the new lot (DVC-LVS) to the existing vaccine that has been in use for decades (USAMRIID-LVS). The vaccines were delivered by scarification to 228 participants. Safety, reactogenicity, take and/or antibody levels were assessed on days 0, 1, 2, 8, 14, 28, 56, and 180.

Both vaccines were safe and had acceptable reactogenicity profiles during six months of follow-up. There were no serious or grade 3 and 4 laboratory adverse events. Moderate systemic reactogenicity (mostly headache or feeling tired) was reported by ∼23% of participants receiving either vaccine. Injection site reactogenicity was mostly mild itchiness and pain. The frequencies of vaccine take skin reactions were 73% (95% CI, 64, 81) for DVC-LVS and 80% (95% CI, 71, 87) for USAMRIID-LVS. The 90% CI for the difference in proportions was -6.9% (-16.4, 2.6). The rates of seroconversion measured by microagglutination assay on days 28 or 56 were 94% (95% CI, 88, 98; n=98/104) for DVC-LVS and 94% (95% CI, 87, 97; n=103/110) for USAMRIID-LVS (p=1.00). Day 14 sera revealed more rapid seroconversion for DVC-LVS relative to USAMRIID-LVS: 82% (95% CI, 73, 89) versus 55% (95% CI, 45, 65), respectively (p<0.0001).

The DVC-LVS vaccine had similar safety, reactogenicity, take and antibody responses compared to the older USAMRIID vaccine, and was superior for early (day 14) antibody production. Vaccination take was not a sensitive surrogate for seroconversion in a multi-center study where personnel at five research clinics performed assessments. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT01150695.

Далучайцеся да нашай
старонкі ў facebook

Самая поўная база дадзеных пра лекавыя травы, падтрыманая навукай

  • Працуе на 55 мовах
  • Лячэнне травой пры падтрымцы навукі
  • Распазнаванне траў па малюнку
  • Інтэрактыўная GPS-карта - пазначце травы па месцы (хутка)
  • Чытайце навуковыя публікацыі, звязаныя з вашым пошукам
  • Шукайце лекавыя зёлкі па іх уздзеянні
  • Арганізуйце свае інтарэсы і будзьце ў курсе навінавых даследаванняў, клінічных выпрабаванняў і патэнтаў

Увядзіце сімптом альбо захворванне і прачытайце пра зёлкі, якія могуць дапамагчы, набярыце траву і паглядзіце хваробы і сімптомы, супраць якіх яна выкарыстоўваецца.
* Уся інфармацыя заснавана на апублікаваных навуковых даследаваннях

Google Play badgeApp Store badge