Български
Albanian
Arabic
Armenian
Azerbaijani
Belarusian
Bengali
Bosnian
Catalan
Czech
Danish
Deutsch
Dutch
English
Estonian
Finnish
Français
Greek
Haitian Creole
Hebrew
Hindi
Hungarian
Icelandic
Indonesian
Irish
Italian
Japanese
Korean
Latvian
Lithuanian
Macedonian
Mongolian
Norwegian
Persian
Polish
Portuguese
Romanian
Russian
Serbian
Slovak
Slovenian
Spanish
Swahili
Swedish
Turkish
Ukrainian
Vietnamese
Български
中文(简体)
中文(繁體)
World Neurosurgery 2018-May

Advantages and Disadvantages of Combined Chemotherapy with Carmustine Wafer and Bevacizumab in Patients with Newly Diagnosed Glioblastoma: A Single-Institutional Experience.

Само регистрирани потребители могат да превеждат статии
Вход / Регистрация
Линкът е запазен в клипборда
Yukinori Akiyama
Yuusuke Kimura
Rei Enatsu
Takeshi Mikami
Masahiko Wanibuchi
Nobuhiro Mikuni

Ключови думи

Резюме

OBJECTIVE

To retrospectively determine the safety and efficacy of combined chemotherapy with carmustine (BCNU) wafer, bevacizumab, and temozolomide plus radiotherapy in patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma (GBM).

METHODS

A total of 54 consecutive newly diagnosed GBMs were resected at our institution between 2010 and 2016. Twenty-nine patients underwent BCNU wafer implantation into the resection cavity followed by standard radiochemotherapy with temozolomide (TMZ, Stupp regimen) plus additional bevacizumab treatment between 2013 and 2016. Twenty-five patients who underwent resection without BCNU implantation between 2010 and 2012 were enrolled as a control group; these patients were treated with the Stupp regimen and did not receive bevacizumab. This retrospective study included evaluation of progression-free survival and overall survival, plus comparisons between the combined therapy group and the control group.

RESULTS

There were no significant differences in age, sex, Karnofsky Performance Status on admission, isocitrate dehydrogenase 1/2 mutation ratio, or resection rate between the combined and standard therapy groups. The median overall survival in the combined therapy group and control group was 24.2 months and 15.30, respectively (P = 0.027). The median progression-free survival was 16.8 months and 7.30 months, respectively (P = 0.009). Overall, the incidence of adverse events leading to discontinuation of the study drug was similar between the treatment groups, except for infection, which was more common in the combined treatment group and required repeat surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

The combined therapy showed higher efficacy compared with standard therapy in patients with GBM. Therefore, combined therapy seems to be effective with an acceptable toxicity profile.

Присъединете се към нашата
страница във facebook

Най-пълната база данни за лечебни билки, подкрепена от науката

  • Работи на 55 езика
  • Билкови лекове, подкрепени от науката
  • Разпознаване на билки по изображение
  • Интерактивна GPS карта - маркирайте билките на място (очаквайте скоро)
  • Прочетете научни публикации, свързани с вашето търсене
  • Търсете лечебни билки по техните ефекти
  • Организирайте вашите интереси и бъдете в крак с научните статии, клиничните изследвания и патентите

Въведете симптом или болест и прочетете за билките, които биха могли да помогнат, напишете билка и вижте болестите и симптомите, срещу които се използва.
* Цялата информация се базира на публикувани научни изследвания

Google Play badgeApp Store badge