Effects of novel and wild-type endophytes in perennial ryegrass on cow health and production.
Ключови думи
Резюме
OBJECTIVE
To measure the effects of AR37, AR1 and Wild-type endophytes in perennial ryegrass on cow health and milk production.
METHODS
Four indoor and six grazing experiments were used to evaluate a perennial ryegrass cultivar containing either novel (AR37, AR1) or Wild-type (HE or Standard) endophytes or no endophyte (Nil). Three hectares of each ryegrass/endophyte association were sown with a white clover cultivar in April 2005 and either grazed or cut for indoor feeding from July 2005 to March 2009. The novel endophytes were distinguished by the production of epoxy-janthitrems by AR37 and peramine only by AR1, both of which deter insect attack. This is the first assessment of the effects of AR37 endophyte on dairy cow health and production. In all experiments, cows were monitored for indications of ryegrass staggers (RGS) by visual scoring, respiration rate as an indicator of heat stress and, in some instances, packed cell volume (blood haematocrit), blood serum albumin concentrations and skin elasticity as indicators of dehydration. Milk production and composition were measured routinely. Pasture production, composition and alkaloid content were determined, as well as temperature and humidity in the indoor feeding facility. Indoor experiments enabled accurate measurement of dry matter intakes, as well as water consumption in some instances.
RESULTS
Cows eating AR37 or AR1 ryegrass did not develop RGS. During indoor feeding experiments in summer and autumn, cows eating ryegrass infected with Wild-type (Wild-type ryegrass) always developed RGS, while under rotational grazing, onset of RGS was less predictable and rarely affected all animals in the group. Severity of RGS was related to the concentration of lolitrem B in ryegrass. No cows demonstrated signs of extreme heat stress in any situation. During summer indoor feeding, cows eating ryegrass infected with AR1 endophyte (AR1 ryegrass) sometimes produced more milk and milksolids (MS) compared to ryegrass infected with AR37 (AR37 ryegrass). The dry matter intakes of cows fed AR37 ryegrass were sometimes higher than those fed AR1, and intakes were lowest when Wild-type ryegrass was fed. Water intakes of cows fed Wild-type ryegrass indoors were lower than those of cows fed AR1 or AR37 ryegrass in two of the three summer indoor experiments. The cows fed AR1 ryegrass indoors always produced more MS than cows fed Wild-type ryegrass. Under grazing, the same trends were detected, but production over three full lactations was similar for AR1 and AR37 ryegrass.
CONCLUSIONS
The absence of animal health and management problems, especially RGS, makes the novel endophytes AR37 and AR1 attractive alternatives to Wild-type ryegrass. Total MS production over three consecutive lactations was not affected by endophyte treatment. The choice of novel endophyte for pasture renewal will depend on local insect pest populations.
