Български
Albanian
Arabic
Armenian
Azerbaijani
Belarusian
Bengali
Bosnian
Catalan
Czech
Danish
Deutsch
Dutch
English
Estonian
Finnish
Français
Greek
Haitian Creole
Hebrew
Hindi
Hungarian
Icelandic
Indonesian
Irish
Italian
Japanese
Korean
Latvian
Lithuanian
Macedonian
Mongolian
Norwegian
Persian
Polish
Portuguese
Romanian
Russian
Serbian
Slovak
Slovenian
Spanish
Swahili
Swedish
Turkish
Ukrainian
Vietnamese
Български
中文(简体)
中文(繁體)
European Journal of Pharmacology 2020-Aug

Microstructure analysis of the effects of the cannabinoid agents HU-210 and rimonabant in rats licking for sucrose

Само регистрирани потребители могат да превеждат статии
Вход / Регистрация
Линкът е запазен в клипборда
Paolo D'Aquila

Ключови думи

Резюме

Stimulation of cannabinoid CB1 receptors generally increases ingestion. However, the non-selective cannabinoid receptor agonist HU-210 exerts the opposite effect. The first objective of this study was to investigate the role of CB1 receptors in this "atypical" effect. Studies on the endocannabinoid system investigating the microstructure of licking for palatable solutions reported inconsistent results as for the role of CB1 receptors in "liking" and "wanting". The second objective was to deal with these inconsistencies investigating the within-session time-course of licking-burst number. The microstructure of licking for a 10% sucrose solution in 30-min sessions was analysed in two experiments. In Experiment 1, the effect of the CB1 receptor antagonist-inverse agonist rimonabant (0.5, 1 mg/kg) on HU-210 effect (100 μg/kg) was investigated. A dose range of HU-210 (25, 50, 100 μg/kg) was examined in Experiment 2. In Experiment 1, both HU-210 and rimonabant reduced licking due to reduced burst number. Moreover, HU-210 reduced the intra-burst lick rate, an index of motor competence. HU-210 effects were antagonised by rimonabant, and vice versa. Rimonabant decreased burst number late in the session at 0.5 mg/kg, and since the beginning of the session at 1 mg/kg. In Experiment 2, HU-210 failed to affect overall ingestion. These results suggest that HU-210 effect - when present - depends on CB1 receptor stimulation, possibly leading to impairment of the motor competence necessary for licking. The reduction of burst number late in the session observed with rimonabant 0.5 mg/kg, which resembles the effect of reward devaluation, might suggest reduced "liking".

Keywords: Behavioural activation; HU-210; Licking microstructure; Reward; Reward-evaluation; Rimonabant.

Присъединете се към нашата
страница във facebook

Най-пълната база данни за лечебни билки, подкрепена от науката

  • Работи на 55 езика
  • Билкови лекове, подкрепени от науката
  • Разпознаване на билки по изображение
  • Интерактивна GPS карта - маркирайте билките на място (очаквайте скоро)
  • Прочетете научни публикации, свързани с вашето търсене
  • Търсете лечебни билки по техните ефекти
  • Организирайте вашите интереси и бъдете в крак с научните статии, клиничните изследвания и патентите

Въведете симптом или болест и прочетете за билките, които биха могли да помогнат, напишете билка и вижте болестите и симптомите, срещу които се използва.
* Цялата информация се базира на публикувани научни изследвания

Google Play badgeApp Store badge