Bosnian
Albanian
Arabic
Armenian
Azerbaijani
Belarusian
Bengali
Bosnian
Catalan
Czech
Danish
Deutsch
Dutch
English
Estonian
Finnish
Français
Greek
Haitian Creole
Hebrew
Hindi
Hungarian
Icelandic
Indonesian
Irish
Italian
Japanese
Korean
Latvian
Lithuanian
Macedonian
Mongolian
Norwegian
Persian
Polish
Portuguese
Romanian
Russian
Serbian
Slovak
Slovenian
Spanish
Swahili
Swedish
Turkish
Ukrainian
Vietnamese
Български
中文(简体)
中文(繁體)
British Journal of Nutrition 2010-May

Dietary patterns and risk of asthma: results from three countries in European Community Respiratory Health Survey-II.

Samo registrirani korisnici mogu prevoditi članke
Prijavite se / prijavite se
Veza se sprema u međuspremnik
Richard Hooper
Joachim Heinrich
Ernst Omenaas
Stefanie Sausenthaler
Vanessa Garcia-Larsen
Ioannis Bakolis
Peter Burney

Ključne riječi

Sažetak

Dietary patterns offer an alternative to the analysis of individual foods or nutrients in nutritional epidemiological studies. The aim of the present study was to identify dietary patterns common to different European countries and examine their associations with asthma. In five study centres (two in Germany, two in the UK and one in Norway), 1174 adults aged 29-55 years completed a FFQ and respiratory symptoms questionnaire. A meta-analytic approach was used to identify the dietary patterns and analyse them in relation to current asthma, asthma symptoms and bronchial responsiveness (BHR). Two patterns emerged, generally correlating with the same foods at different centres: one associated with intake of meats and potatoes; the other with fish, fruits and vegetables. There was no evidence that the fish, fruits and vegetables pattern was associated with asthma (OR 1.11 (95 % CI 0.93, 1.33)), symptom score (ratio of means 1.07 (0.98, 1.17)) or BHR (regression coefficient - 0.01 ( - 0.12, 0.10)), though these CI appeared to rule out large protective effects of consuming these foods. There was no overall evidence that the meat and potato pattern was associated with asthma (OR 1.02 (0.79, 1.31)), symptom score (ratio of means 1.07 (0.84, 1.36)) or BHR (regression coefficient - 0.08 ( - 0.27, 0.10)), but there was heterogeneity between centres in the association with symptom score: a negative association at the two German centres; a positive association at the others. Heterogeneity in a multi-centre observational study of diet could suggest alternative explanations for apparent effects of diet, such as uncontrolled confounding.

Pridružite se našoj
facebook stranici

Najkompletnija baza ljekovitog bilja potpomognuta naukom

  • Radi na 55 jezika
  • Biljni lijekovi potpomognuti naukom
  • Prepoznavanje biljaka po slici
  • Interaktivna GPS karta - označite bilje na lokaciji (uskoro)
  • Pročitajte naučne publikacije povezane sa vašom pretragom
  • Pretražite ljekovito bilje po učincima
  • Organizirajte svoja interesovanja i budite u toku sa istraživanjem vijesti, kliničkim ispitivanjima i patentima

Upišite simptom ili bolest i pročitajte o biljkama koje bi mogle pomoći, unesite travu i pogledajte bolesti i simptome protiv kojih se koristi.
* Sve informacije temelje se na objavljenim naučnim istraživanjima

Google Play badgeApp Store badge