No effects of olive oils with different phenolic content compared to corn oil on 1,2-dimethylhydrazine-induced colon carcinogenesis in rats.
Ključne riječi
Sažetak
BACKGROUND
Some epidemiological and experimental studies suggest that olive oil, despite its elevated caloric content, may have protective activity against colon cancer, partially due to its phenolic content. However, little experimental evidence exists to support this claim in vivo.
OBJECTIVE
To test the effect of olive oils with different phenolic content in a well-characterized model of colon carcinogenesis, comparing them with corn oil (CO).
METHODS
F344 rats were fed AIN-76 based diets for the entire experimental period; the diets contained 23% (w/w) of lipids from three different sources: extra-virgin olive oil rich in phenolic compounds (EV), rectified olive oil (ROO) with the same fatty acid composition but devoid of phenolic compounds and CO as a control diet. One week later, rats were induced with 1,2-dimethylhydrazine (DMH) (150 mg/kg b.w. x 2 times) to measure preneoplastic lesions (aberrant crypt foci (ACF) and mucin depleted foci (MDF)) and tumours in the intestine.
RESULTS
Thirteen weeks after DMH, the numbers of ACF and MDF were similar in the different groups (ACF/colon were 344.9 +/- 27.0, 288.6 +/- 28.5 and 289.8 +/- 21.4 in CO, EV and ROO groups, respectively, means +/- SE; MDF/colon were 8.83 +/- 1.2, 8.41 +/- 1.5 and 8.75 +/- 1.6 in CO, EV and ROO groups, respectively, means +/- SE). Thirty-two weeks after DMH, the incidence of tumours (rats with tumours/rats in the group) did not differ among the different groups (20/21, 18/19 and 20/20 in the CO, EV, and ROO groups, respectively). Similarly, the number of tumours/ rat in the colorectum (both adenomas and cancers) was not different in the three different groups (2.33 +/- 0.26, 2.42 +/- 0.41 and 2.25 +/- 0.40 in CO, EV and ROO groups, respectively, means +/- SE).
CONCLUSIONS
Olive oil, irrespective of its phenolic content, does not affect DMH-induced colon carcinogenesis in F344 rats compared with CO.
