Czech
Albanian
Arabic
Armenian
Azerbaijani
Belarusian
Bengali
Bosnian
Catalan
Czech
Danish
Deutsch
Dutch
English
Estonian
Finnish
Français
Greek
Haitian Creole
Hebrew
Hindi
Hungarian
Icelandic
Indonesian
Irish
Italian
Japanese
Korean
Latvian
Lithuanian
Macedonian
Mongolian
Norwegian
Persian
Polish
Portuguese
Romanian
Russian
Serbian
Slovak
Slovenian
Spanish
Swahili
Swedish
Turkish
Ukrainian
Vietnamese
Български
中文(简体)
中文(繁體)
Minerva Urologica e Nefrologica 2015-Dec

Clinical comparison of two new minimally invasive techniques in the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia: Twister™ Diode Laser System vs. BiVap (Richard Wolf®) saline vaporization of the prostate.

Články mohou překládat pouze registrovaní uživatelé
Přihlášení Registrace
Odkaz je uložen do schránky
A Karakose
O Aydogdu
Y Z Atesci

Klíčová slova

Abstraktní

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to evaluate complications and postoperative follow-up outcomes of the recently developing endoscopic techniques of BiVap (Richard Wolf®) and Twister™ system in patients with benign prostatic obstruction (BPO).

METHODS

Eighty patients treated with BiVap (Richard Wolf®) (N.=46) and Twister™ system (N.=34) were included in the study. Operation, hospitalization and catheter removal time were noted. Postoperative complications including urinary tract infection, transient hematuria, severe dysuria, and fever >38° C, urinary incontinence and urethral stricture were also noted. All patients were evaluated at the postoperative 1st, 3rd, 6th and 12th month and preoperative and postoperative values of IPSS score, QoL score, total PSA, IIEF 15, PVR, Qmax and Qave were compared. Statistical analyses were performed with SPSS version 18. A P-value<0.05 was considered significant.

RESULTS

Mean age of the patients was 64.1 ± 7.1 years. Significant improvement was observed for IPSS, Qmax, Qave, PVR, and QoL score by the postoperative first month compared to the preoperative values in both groups. In group 1 maximum improvement in the IPSS, Qmax, Qave, QoL score and PVR were achieved at postoperative 3, 3, 12, 3 and 12th months, respectively. In group 2 maximum improvement in the IPSS, Qmax, Qave, QoL score and PVR were achieved at postoperative 6, 3, 6, 6 and 3rd months, respectively. There was no significant difference between the two groups in terms of IPSS, Qmax, Qave, QoL, PSA, PVR, IIEF (Total), IIEF-EF, IIEF-IS, IIEF-OF, IIEF-SD and IIEF-OS during the 1 year follow-up period. Total IIEF and subgroup scores improved to their preoperative levels by the postoperative 3rd month in both groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Both BiVap (Richard Wolf®) and Twister™ systems are safe and highly effective minimal invasive techniques, which can be used in the surgical treatment of BPO.

Připojte se k naší
facebookové stránce

Nejúplnější databáze léčivých bylin podložená vědou

  • Funguje v 55 jazycích
  • Bylinné léky podporované vědou
  • Rozpoznávání bylin podle obrázku
  • Interaktivní mapa GPS - označte byliny na místě (již brzy)
  • Přečtěte si vědecké publikace související s vaším hledáním
  • Hledejte léčivé byliny podle jejich účinků
  • Uspořádejte své zájmy a držte krok s novinkami, klinickými testy a patenty

Zadejte symptom nebo chorobu a přečtěte si o bylinách, které by vám mohly pomoci, napište bylinu a podívejte se na nemoci a příznaky, proti kterým se používá.
* Všechny informace vycházejí z publikovaného vědeckého výzkumu

Google Play badgeApp Store badge