Czech
Albanian
Arabic
Armenian
Azerbaijani
Belarusian
Bengali
Bosnian
Catalan
Czech
Danish
Deutsch
Dutch
English
Estonian
Finnish
Français
Greek
Haitian Creole
Hebrew
Hindi
Hungarian
Icelandic
Indonesian
Irish
Italian
Japanese
Korean
Latvian
Lithuanian
Macedonian
Mongolian
Norwegian
Persian
Polish
Portuguese
Romanian
Russian
Serbian
Slovak
Slovenian
Spanish
Swahili
Swedish
Turkish
Ukrainian
Vietnamese
Български
中文(简体)
中文(繁體)
Laboratory animal research 2017-Sep

Preclinical safety assessment of Angelica acutiloba using a 13-week repeated dose oral toxicity study in rats.

Články mohou překládat pouze registrovaní uživatelé
Přihlášení Registrace
Odkaz je uložen do schránky
Jun-Won Yun
Euna Kwon
Seung-Hyun Kim
Ji-Ran You
Yun-Soon Kim
In Ae Park
Hyeon Hoe Kim
Jeong-Hwan Che
Byeong-Cheol Kang

Klíčová slova

Abstraktní

Angelica acutiloba (AA), a Japanese species of Danggui, has been used worldwide as a traditional herbal medicine with several bioactivities including anti-diabetic, anti-allergic, anti-inflammatory, anti-tumor, and anti-obesity. However, there is lack of toxicological data available to evaluate potential long-term toxicity and the no-observed-adverse-effect level (NOAEL) of AA extract in accordance with the test guidelines published by the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. In the 14-day repeat-dose toxicity study, no adverse effects on mortality, body weight change, clinical signs, and organ weights was found following repeat oral administration to rats for 14 days (125, 250, 500, 1000, and 2000 mg/kg body weight), leading that 2000 mg/kg is the highest recommended dose of AA extract for the 13-week repeat-dose oral toxicity study. In the 13-week repeat-dose oral toxicity study, the AA extract was orally administered to groups of rats for 13 weeks (125, 250, 500, 1000, and 2000 mg/kg body weight) to compare between control and AA extract groups. The administration of AA extract did not produce mortality or remarkable clinical signs during this 13-week study. And, the data revealed that there were no significant differences in food/water consumption, body weight, hematological parameters, clinical chemistry parameters, gross macroscopic findings, organ weight and histopathology in comparison to the control group. On the basis of these results, the subchronic NOAEL of the AA extract was more than 2000 mg/kg/day when tested in rats. And, the AA extract is considered safe to use orally as a traditional herbal medicine.

Připojte se k naší
facebookové stránce

Nejúplnější databáze léčivých bylin podložená vědou

  • Funguje v 55 jazycích
  • Bylinné léky podporované vědou
  • Rozpoznávání bylin podle obrázku
  • Interaktivní mapa GPS - označte byliny na místě (již brzy)
  • Přečtěte si vědecké publikace související s vaším hledáním
  • Hledejte léčivé byliny podle jejich účinků
  • Uspořádejte své zájmy a držte krok s novinkami, klinickými testy a patenty

Zadejte symptom nebo chorobu a přečtěte si o bylinách, které by vám mohly pomoci, napište bylinu a podívejte se na nemoci a příznaky, proti kterým se používá.
* Všechny informace vycházejí z publikovaného vědeckého výzkumu

Google Play badgeApp Store badge