Danish
Albanian
Arabic
Armenian
Azerbaijani
Belarusian
Bengali
Bosnian
Catalan
Czech
Danish
Deutsch
Dutch
English
Estonian
Finnish
Français
Greek
Haitian Creole
Hebrew
Hindi
Hungarian
Icelandic
Indonesian
Irish
Italian
Japanese
Korean
Latvian
Lithuanian
Macedonian
Mongolian
Norwegian
Persian
Polish
Portuguese
Romanian
Russian
Serbian
Slovak
Slovenian
Spanish
Swahili
Swedish
Turkish
Ukrainian
Vietnamese
Български
中文(简体)
中文(繁體)
Ophthalmology 2020-Sep

Refractive Error and Retinopathy Outcomes in Type 1 Diabetes: the DCCT/EDIC Study

Kun registrerede brugere kan oversætte artikler
Log ind / Tilmeld
Linket gemmes på udklipsholderen
Writing Group
Dean Hainsworth
Xiaoyu Gao
Ionut Bebu
Arup Das
Lisa de Koo
Andrew Barkmeier
William Tamborlane
John Lachin
Lloyd Aiello

Nøgleord

Abstrakt

Objective: Determine relationship between refractive error and diabetic retinopathy (DR).

Design: Clinical trial SUBJECTS: Myopia is a non-modifiable risk factor reportedly associated with less severe DR in small case series, but this association has not been confirmed in large prospective studies. With a large cohort of patients with type I diabetes followed over 30 years with serial refractive error and DR stage measurements, the Diabetes Control and Complications Trial and follow-up Epidemiology of Diabetes Interventions and Complications study (DCCT/EDIC) provide a unique opportunity to evaluate the association between refractive error and DR development and progression.

Methods: DR stage was measured every six months from standard fundus photographs and refractive error was measured annually during the 6.5 years of DCCT, then both were staggered every fourth year during EDIC with the full cohort measured at EDIC years 4 and 10. DR outcomes were 2- or 3-step progression, presence of proliferative DR (PDR), clinically significant macular edema (CSME), diabetic macular edema (DME) or ocular surgery. Myopia, emmetropia and hyperopia were defined as a spherical equivalent of ≤ -0.5, > -0.5 and < 0.5, and ≥0.5, respectively.

Main outcome measures: For each outcome separately, Cox proportional hazards models assessed the association between refractive error status and the subsequent risk of that outcome, both without and with adjustment for potential risk factors.

Results: Hyperopia was associated with higher risk of 2-step progression (hazard ratio (HR)=1.29, 95%CI 1.05-1.59), 3-step progression (HR=1.35, 95%CI 1.05-1.73) and PDR (HR=1.40, 95%CI 1.02-1.92) compared to emmetropia in unadjusted models. These associations remained significant after adjustment for DCCT treatment group, cohort, age, sex, smoking, duration of diabetes, systolic and diastolic blood pressure, pulse, LDL, HDL, triglycerides, albumin excretion rate, and DCCT/EDIC mean updated HbA1c (2-step progression: HR=1.28, 95%CI 1.03-1.58; 3-step progression: HR=1.30, 95%CI 1.00-1.68; PDR: HR=1.38, 95%CI 1.00-1.90). Myopia was not associated with any of the five DR outcomes in the unadjusted models, and only marginally associated with 2-step progression (HR=1.11, 95%CI 1.00-1.24) in the adjusted models.

Conclusions: Myopia is not associated with DR progression risk. Hyperopia is an independent risk factor for 2-step and 3-step DR progression and PDR.

Keywords: DCCT/EDIC; Diabetes mellitus; diabetic retinopathy; refractive error.

Deltag i vores
facebook-side

Den mest komplette database med medicinske urter understøttet af videnskab

  • Arbejder på 55 sprog
  • Urtekurer, der understøttes af videnskab
  • Urtegenkendelse ved billede
  • Interaktivt GPS-kort - tag urter på stedet (kommer snart)
  • Læs videnskabelige publikationer relateret til din søgning
  • Søg medicinske urter efter deres virkninger
  • Organiser dine interesser og hold dig opdateret med nyhedsundersøgelser, kliniske forsøg og patenter

Skriv et symptom eller en sygdom, og læs om urter, der kan hjælpe, skriv en urt og se sygdomme og symptomer, den bruges mod.
* Al information er baseret på offentliggjort videnskabelig forskning

Google Play badgeApp Store badge