Deutsch
Albanian
Arabic
Armenian
Azerbaijani
Belarusian
Bengali
Bosnian
Catalan
Czech
Danish
Deutsch
Dutch
English
Estonian
Finnish
Français
Greek
Haitian Creole
Hebrew
Hindi
Hungarian
Icelandic
Indonesian
Irish
Italian
Japanese
Korean
Latvian
Lithuanian
Macedonian
Mongolian
Norwegian
Persian
Polish
Portuguese
Romanian
Russian
Serbian
Slovak
Slovenian
Spanish
Swahili
Swedish
Turkish
Ukrainian
Vietnamese
Български
中文(简体)
中文(繁體)
Journal of Chromatography A 2004-Nov

Comparison of extraction methods for quantitation of methionine and selenomethionine in yeast by species specific isotope dilution gas chromatography-mass spectrometry.

Nur registrierte Benutzer können Artikel übersetzen
Einloggen Anmelden
Der Link wird in der Zwischenablage gespeichert
Lu Yang
Ralph E Sturgeon
Shona McSheehy
Zoltán Mester

Schlüsselwörter

Abstrakt

Fourteen extraction methods commonly cited in the literature were evaluated for the quantitation of methionine (Met) and selenomethionine (SeMet) in a yeast candidate certified reference material (CRM). Species specific isotope dilution (ID) gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS) was utilized to effectively compensate for potential errors, such as losses during derivatization and clean up steps. Despite different extraction methods, the same derivatization procedure using methyl chloroformate was applied with a single exception, which was based on digestion with cyanogen bromide with 2% SnCl2 in 0.1 M HCl. Significant differences in measured Met and SeMet concentrations were obtained when different extraction methods were used. A 4 M methanesulfonic acid reflux digestion was found to be the most efficient for both analytes. Digestion with CNBr with 2% SnCl2 in 0.1 M HCl for the determination of SeMet showed the second highest extraction efficiency. Despite frequent use of enzymatic hydrolysis for the extraction of SeMet from yeast, very low extraction efficiencies for both analytes were obtained for four of eight tested methods. Among these, the highest extraction efficiencies for both analytes were obtained using 20mg pronase and 10mg lipase with incubation at 37 degrees C for 24 h. However, recoveries remained nearly 30 and 50% lower for Met and SeMet, respectively, compared to extraction with methanesulfonic acid. Lowest extraction efficiencies for both analytes were obtained when HCl or tetramethylammonium hydroxide (TMAH) digestions were used. Efficient extraction was also achieved using 200 mg (or 400 mg) of protease XIV with incubation at 37 degrees C for 72 h (or 24 h). Concentrations of 3331+/-45 and 3334+/-39 microg g(-1) (mean and one standard deviation, n = 4) for SeMet were obtained using 200 mg (72 h incubation) and 400 mg (24 h incubation) of protease XIV, respectively, in agreement with a value of 3404+/-38 microg g(-1) obtained using a methanesulfonic acid reflux.

Treten Sie unserer
Facebook-Seite bei

Die vollständigste Datenbank für Heilkräuter, die von der Wissenschaft unterstützt wird

  • Arbeitet in 55 Sprachen
  • Von der Wissenschaft unterstützte Kräuterkuren
  • Kräutererkennung durch Bild
  • Interaktive GPS-Karte - Kräuter vor Ort markieren (in Kürze)
  • Lesen Sie wissenschaftliche Veröffentlichungen zu Ihrer Suche
  • Suchen Sie nach Heilkräutern nach ihrer Wirkung
  • Organisieren Sie Ihre Interessen und bleiben Sie über Neuigkeiten, klinische Studien und Patente auf dem Laufenden

Geben Sie ein Symptom oder eine Krankheit ein und lesen Sie über Kräuter, die helfen könnten, geben Sie ein Kraut ein und sehen Sie Krankheiten und Symptome, gegen die es angewendet wird.
* Alle Informationen basieren auf veröffentlichten wissenschaftlichen Forschungsergebnissen

Google Play badgeApp Store badge