Deutsch
Albanian
Arabic
Armenian
Azerbaijani
Belarusian
Bengali
Bosnian
Catalan
Czech
Danish
Deutsch
Dutch
English
Estonian
Finnish
Français
Greek
Haitian Creole
Hebrew
Hindi
Hungarian
Icelandic
Indonesian
Irish
Italian
Japanese
Korean
Latvian
Lithuanian
Macedonian
Mongolian
Norwegian
Persian
Polish
Portuguese
Romanian
Russian
Serbian
Slovak
Slovenian
Spanish
Swahili
Swedish
Turkish
Ukrainian
Vietnamese
Български
中文(简体)
中文(繁體)
American Journal of Roentgenology 1993-Sep

Diagnosis of diseases of the trachea and main bronchi: chest radiography vs CT.

Nur registrierte Benutzer können Artikel übersetzen
Einloggen Anmelden
Der Link wird in der Zwischenablage gespeichert
J S Kwong
B D Adler
S P Padley
N L Müller

Schlüsselwörter

Abstrakt

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to compare the sensitivities and diagnostic accuracies of chest radiography and CT in the assessment of diseases of the trachea and main bronchi in regard to detection, evaluation of focal vs diffuse disease, separation of benign from malignant disease, and accuracy of diagnosis.

METHODS

The chest radiographs and CT scans of 35 patients with proved diseases of the trachea and main bronchi and five control subjects were randomly assessed by two independent observers in a blind study. The diagnoses included 25 malignant and 10 benign conditions. The malignant lesions included 24 primary tumors and one metastatic melanoma. The benign lesions included two benign tumors, two tracheal stenoses, one focal amyloidosis, one tracheomalacia, and four miscellaneous diffuse abnormalities. The observers were asked to determine if an abnormality was present, to classify it as focal or diffuse and as benign or malignant, and to list the three most likely diagnoses. Sensitivities were compared by using the McNemar test.

RESULTS

The sensitivity of both observers in detecting disease on the chest radiograph was 66%. The sensitivity on the CT scan was 97% for the first observer and 91% for the second observer (p < .01). Both observers were able to correctly classify the detected abnormalities as either focal or diffuse in 91% of cases on the chest radiographs and 97% of cases on the CT scans. The abnormalities were correctly classified as either benign or malignant in 78% of cases by both observers on the chest radiographs and in 85% and 78% of cases on the CT scans by the first observer and the second observer, respectively. The correct diagnosis was included in the list of the three most likely diagnoses in 61% of cases by both observers after reviewing the radiographs and in 56% of cases by one observer and 63% of cases by the other observer after reviewing the CT scans.

CONCLUSIONS

CT is superior to chest radiography in allowing detection of abnormalities of the major airways. Both CT and chest radiography are accurate for differentiating focal from diffuse disease, but neither technique is accurate for distinguishing benign from malignant disease or for establishing a specific diagnosis.

Treten Sie unserer
Facebook-Seite bei

Die vollständigste Datenbank für Heilkräuter, die von der Wissenschaft unterstützt wird

  • Arbeitet in 55 Sprachen
  • Von der Wissenschaft unterstützte Kräuterkuren
  • Kräutererkennung durch Bild
  • Interaktive GPS-Karte - Kräuter vor Ort markieren (in Kürze)
  • Lesen Sie wissenschaftliche Veröffentlichungen zu Ihrer Suche
  • Suchen Sie nach Heilkräutern nach ihrer Wirkung
  • Organisieren Sie Ihre Interessen und bleiben Sie über Neuigkeiten, klinische Studien und Patente auf dem Laufenden

Geben Sie ein Symptom oder eine Krankheit ein und lesen Sie über Kräuter, die helfen könnten, geben Sie ein Kraut ein und sehen Sie Krankheiten und Symptome, gegen die es angewendet wird.
* Alle Informationen basieren auf veröffentlichten wissenschaftlichen Forschungsergebnissen

Google Play badgeApp Store badge