Deutsch
Albanian
Arabic
Armenian
Azerbaijani
Belarusian
Bengali
Bosnian
Catalan
Czech
Danish
Deutsch
Dutch
English
Estonian
Finnish
Français
Greek
Haitian Creole
Hebrew
Hindi
Hungarian
Icelandic
Indonesian
Irish
Italian
Japanese
Korean
Latvian
Lithuanian
Macedonian
Mongolian
Norwegian
Persian
Polish
Portuguese
Romanian
Russian
Serbian
Slovak
Slovenian
Spanish
Swahili
Swedish
Turkish
Ukrainian
Vietnamese
Български
中文(简体)
中文(繁體)
Clinical Nephrology 2006-Mar

Lanthanum carbonate versus standard therapy for the treatment of hyperphosphatemia: safety and efficacy in chronic maintenance hemodialysis patients.

Nur registrierte Benutzer können Artikel übersetzen
Einloggen Anmelden
Der Link wird in der Zwischenablage gespeichert
W F Finn
SPD 405-307 Lanthanum Study Group

Schlüsselwörter

Abstrakt

OBJECTIVE

No conventional phosphate binder is entirely satisfactory for the treatment of hyperphosphatemia in patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD). Consequently, there is a need for new agents. One such agent is lanthanum carbonate (La). This large-scale study compares the safety of La with standard therapy (any approved phosphate binder) in patients who were treated for up to 2 years. Efficacy, having previously been demonstrated, was a secondary endpoint.

METHODS

After washout, patients were randomized to receive La (n=682) or their pre-study phosphate binder (n=677). Over a 6-week period, La was titrated to a maximum daily dose of 3000 mg elemental lanthanum (serum phosphorus target levels for titration were < or = 5.9 mg/dl (1.90 mmol/l)). Safety assessments included adverse events (AEs), full laboratory parameters and blood profiles. Efficacy assessments included serum phosphorus, calcium, calcium x phosphorus product and parathyroid hormone (PTH) levels.

RESULTS

Average treatment exposure was greater in the standard therapy group (501.4 days) than in the La group (370.3 days) because standard therapy patients who switched or combined treatments were allowed to continue in the study. The most common AEs were gastrointestinal. The incidences of AEs in the La and treatment exposure-corrected standard therapy groups were nausea, 37 versus 29%; vomiting, 27 versus 22% and diarrhea (24% in each group). Hypercalcemia that was reported as an AE (La versus treatment exposure-corrected standard therapy) occurred in 4.3% and 8.4% of patients, respectively. There was no indication of liver toxicity, suppression of erythropoiesis or changes in the mini-mental state examination. Over 2 years, phosphorus control was similar in both groups; in the La group, however, serum calcium was lower and serum PTH levels were maintained in the range recommended by the National Kidney Foundation Kidney Disease Outcomes Quality Initiative (K/DOQI).

CONCLUSIONS

The 2-year tolerability and efficacy of La are similar to those seen with standard therapy, although lower serum calcium levels and improved PTH levels were observed in the La group. These results support La as a viable new option for the management of hyperphosphatemia in ESRD.

Treten Sie unserer
Facebook-Seite bei

Die vollständigste Datenbank für Heilkräuter, die von der Wissenschaft unterstützt wird

  • Arbeitet in 55 Sprachen
  • Von der Wissenschaft unterstützte Kräuterkuren
  • Kräutererkennung durch Bild
  • Interaktive GPS-Karte - Kräuter vor Ort markieren (in Kürze)
  • Lesen Sie wissenschaftliche Veröffentlichungen zu Ihrer Suche
  • Suchen Sie nach Heilkräutern nach ihrer Wirkung
  • Organisieren Sie Ihre Interessen und bleiben Sie über Neuigkeiten, klinische Studien und Patente auf dem Laufenden

Geben Sie ein Symptom oder eine Krankheit ein und lesen Sie über Kräuter, die helfen könnten, geben Sie ein Kraut ein und sehen Sie Krankheiten und Symptome, gegen die es angewendet wird.
* Alle Informationen basieren auf veröffentlichten wissenschaftlichen Forschungsergebnissen

Google Play badgeApp Store badge