Greek
Albanian
Arabic
Armenian
Azerbaijani
Belarusian
Bengali
Bosnian
Catalan
Czech
Danish
Deutsch
Dutch
English
Estonian
Finnish
Français
Greek
Haitian Creole
Hebrew
Hindi
Hungarian
Icelandic
Indonesian
Irish
Italian
Japanese
Korean
Latvian
Lithuanian
Macedonian
Mongolian
Norwegian
Persian
Polish
Portuguese
Romanian
Russian
Serbian
Slovak
Slovenian
Spanish
Swahili
Swedish
Turkish
Ukrainian
Vietnamese
Български
中文(简体)
中文(繁體)
Malaria Journal 2017-May

Artemisinin-based combination therapy in pregnant women in Zambia: efficacy, safety and risk of recurrent malaria.

Μόνο εγγεγραμμένοι χρήστες μπορούν να μεταφράσουν άρθρα
Σύνδεση εγγραφή
Ο σύνδεσμος αποθηκεύεται στο πρόχειρο
Michael Nambozi
Jean-Bertin Bukasa Kabuya
Sebastian Hachizovu
David Mwakazanga
Joyce Mulenga
Webster Kasongo
Jozefien Buyze
Modest Mulenga
Jean-Pierre Van Geertruyden
Umberto D'Alessandro

Λέξεις-κλειδιά

Αφηρημένη

In Zambia, malaria is one of the leading causes of morbidity and mortality, especially among under five children and pregnant women. For the latter, the World Health Organization recommends the use of artemisinin-based combination therapy (ACT) in the second and third trimester of pregnancy. In a context of limited information on ACT, the safety and efficacy of three combinations, namely artemether-lumefantrine (AL), mefloquine-artesunate (MQAS) and dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine (DHAPQ) were assessed in pregnant women with malaria.

The trial was carried out between July 2010 and August 2013 in Nchelenge district, Luapula Province, an area of high transmission, as part of a multi-centre trial. Women in the second or third trimester of pregnancy and with malaria were recruited and randomized to one of the three study arms. Women were actively followed up for 63 days, and then at delivery and 1 year post-delivery.

Nine hundred pregnant women were included, 300 per arm. PCR-adjusted treatment failure was 4.7% (12/258) (95% CI 2.7-8.0) for AL, 1.3% (3/235) (95% CI 0.4-3.7) for MQAS and 0.8% (2/236) (95% CI 0.2-3.0) for DHAPQ, with significant risk difference between AL and DHAPQ (p = 0.01) and between AL and MQAS (p = 0.03) treatments. Re-infections during follow up were more frequent in the AL (HR: 4.71; 95% CI 3.10-7.2; p < 0.01) and MQAS (HR: 1.59; 95% CI 1.02-2.46; p = 0.04) arms compared to the DHAPQ arm. PCR-adjusted treatment failure was significantly associated with women under 20 years [Hazard Ratio (HR) 5.35 (95% CI 1.07-26.73; p = 0.04)] and higher malaria parasite density [3.23 (95% CI 1.03-10.10; p = 0.04)], and still women under 20 years [1.78, (95% CI 1.26-2.52; p < 0.01)] had a significantly higher risk of re-infection. The three treatments were generally well tolerated. Dizziness, nausea, vomiting, headache and asthenia as adverse events (AEs) were more common in MQAS than in AL or DHAPQ (p < 0.001). Birth outcomes were not significantly different between treatment arms.

As new infections can be prevented by a long acting partner drug to the artemisinins, DHAPQ should be preferred in places as Nchelenge district where transmission is intense while in areas of low transmission intensity AL or MQAS may be used.

Γίνετε μέλος της σελίδας
μας στο facebook

Η πληρέστερη βάση δεδομένων φαρμακευτικών βοτάνων που υποστηρίζεται από την επιστήμη

  • Λειτουργεί σε 55 γλώσσες
  • Βοτανικές θεραπείες που υποστηρίζονται από την επιστήμη
  • Αναγνώριση βοτάνων με εικόνα
  • Διαδραστικός χάρτης GPS - ετικέτα βότανα στην τοποθεσία (σύντομα)
  • Διαβάστε επιστημονικές δημοσιεύσεις που σχετίζονται με την αναζήτησή σας
  • Αναζήτηση φαρμακευτικών βοτάνων με τα αποτελέσματά τους
  • Οργανώστε τα ενδιαφέροντά σας και μείνετε ενημερωμένοι με την έρευνα ειδήσεων, τις κλινικές δοκιμές και τα διπλώματα ευρεσιτεχνίας

Πληκτρολογήστε ένα σύμπτωμα ή μια ασθένεια και διαβάστε για βότανα που μπορεί να βοηθήσουν, πληκτρολογήστε ένα βότανο και δείτε ασθένειες και συμπτώματα κατά των οποίων χρησιμοποιείται.
* Όλες οι πληροφορίες βασίζονται σε δημοσιευμένη επιστημονική έρευνα

Google Play badgeApp Store badge