Greek
Albanian
Arabic
Armenian
Azerbaijani
Belarusian
Bengali
Bosnian
Catalan
Czech
Danish
Deutsch
Dutch
English
Estonian
Finnish
Français
Greek
Haitian Creole
Hebrew
Hindi
Hungarian
Icelandic
Indonesian
Irish
Italian
Japanese
Korean
Latvian
Lithuanian
Macedonian
Mongolian
Norwegian
Persian
Polish
Portuguese
Romanian
Russian
Serbian
Slovak
Slovenian
Spanish
Swahili
Swedish
Turkish
Ukrainian
Vietnamese
Български
中文(简体)
中文(繁體)
JAMA Surgery 2019-Jul

Diagnostic Modalities for Acute Compartment Syndrome of the Extremities: A Systematic Review.

Μόνο εγγεγραμμένοι χρήστες μπορούν να μεταφράσουν άρθρα
Σύνδεση εγγραφή
Ο σύνδεσμος αποθηκεύεται στο πρόχειρο
Sharri Mortensen
Molly Vora
Amin Mohamadi
Casey Wright
Philip Hanna
Aron Lechtig
Jonathan Egan
Patrick Williamson
John Wixted
Seward Rutkove

Λέξεις-κλειδιά

Αφηρημένη

Acute compartment syndrome (ACS) can cause catastrophic tissue damage leading to permanent muscle and nerve loss. Acute compartment syndrome is a clinical diagnosis, with intracompartmental pressure (ICP) used in equivocal cases. There are no reliable diagnostic methods. The clinical evaluation is impossible to standardize, and the threshold for ICP has been known to be unreliable; thus, guidelines for diagnosis can result in overtreatment or delayed diagnosis.To present and review the advantages and disadvantages of each diagnostic modality and identify gaps that need to be addressed in the future and to review the most used and appropriate animal and human ACS models.We included clinical studies and animal models investigating diagnostic modalities for ACS of the extremities. A MEDLINE and Web of Science search was performed. The protocol for the study was registered on PROSPERO (CRD42017079266). We assessed the quality of the clinical studies with Newcastle-Ottawa scale and reported level of evidence for each article.Fifty-one articles were included in this study, reporting on 38 noninvasive and 35 invasive modalities. Near-infrared spectroscopy and direct ICP measurement using a Stryker device were the most common, respectively. Cadaveric studies used saline infusions to create an ACS model. Most studies with human participants included injured patients with acquired ACS or at risk of developing ACS. In healthy human participants, tourniquets formed the most commonly used ACS model. Application of tourniquets and infusion of saline or albumin were the most used ACS models among animal studies.This article reports on the most common as well as many new and modified diagnostic modalities, which can serve as inspiration for future investigations to develop more effective and efficient diagnostic techniques for ACS. Future studies on diagnostic modalities should include the development of tools for continuous assessment of ICP to better identify the earliest alterations suggestive of impending ACS. With the advent of such technologies, it may be possible to develop far less aggressive and more effective approaches for early detection of ACS.

Γίνετε μέλος της σελίδας
μας στο facebook

Η πληρέστερη βάση δεδομένων φαρμακευτικών βοτάνων που υποστηρίζεται από την επιστήμη

  • Λειτουργεί σε 55 γλώσσες
  • Βοτανικές θεραπείες που υποστηρίζονται από την επιστήμη
  • Αναγνώριση βοτάνων με εικόνα
  • Διαδραστικός χάρτης GPS - ετικέτα βότανα στην τοποθεσία (σύντομα)
  • Διαβάστε επιστημονικές δημοσιεύσεις που σχετίζονται με την αναζήτησή σας
  • Αναζήτηση φαρμακευτικών βοτάνων με τα αποτελέσματά τους
  • Οργανώστε τα ενδιαφέροντά σας και μείνετε ενημερωμένοι με την έρευνα ειδήσεων, τις κλινικές δοκιμές και τα διπλώματα ευρεσιτεχνίας

Πληκτρολογήστε ένα σύμπτωμα ή μια ασθένεια και διαβάστε για βότανα που μπορεί να βοηθήσουν, πληκτρολογήστε ένα βότανο και δείτε ασθένειες και συμπτώματα κατά των οποίων χρησιμοποιείται.
* Όλες οι πληροφορίες βασίζονται σε δημοσιευμένη επιστημονική έρευνα

Google Play badgeApp Store badge