English
Albanian
Arabic
Armenian
Azerbaijani
Belarusian
Bengali
Bosnian
Catalan
Czech
Danish
Deutsch
Dutch
English
Estonian
Finnish
Français
Greek
Haitian Creole
Hebrew
Hindi
Hungarian
Icelandic
Indonesian
Irish
Italian
Japanese
Korean
Latvian
Lithuanian
Macedonian
Mongolian
Norwegian
Persian
Polish
Portuguese
Romanian
Russian
Serbian
Slovak
Slovenian
Spanish
Swahili
Swedish
Turkish
Ukrainian
Vietnamese
Български
中文(简体)
中文(繁體)
Acta dermatovenerologica Croatica : ADC 2018-Oct

Autoimmune Progesterone Dermatitis Diagnosed by Lymphocyte Transformation Test and Progesterone Provocation Test.

Only registered users can translate articles
Log In/Sign up
The link is saved to the clipboard
Suzana Ljubojević Hadžavdić
Sandra Marinović Kulišić
Dragana Ljubojević Grgec
Ana Poljanac
Brankica Ilić

Keywords

Abstract

Autoimmune progesterone dermatitis (APD) is rare autoimmune response to endogenous progesterone or to earlier exposure to exogenous progesterone (1). Skin lesions typically occur due to increases in progesterone during the luteal phase of the menstrual cycle (2). A-31-year-old mother of two children presented to our Department with a 5-year history of pruritic and painful erythematosus macules, papules, and patches on her neck, pectoral region, and face, which appeared 2-3 days before the onset of menses and gradually resolved 7-10 days later (Figure 1). The lesions first appeared 10 months after her second pregnancy and a few months after she had started using oral contraceptive pills (OCP) containing gestodene combined with ethinyloestradiol. A few months before presenting to us, the lesions had started spreading on her forearms, elbows, and pretibial areas. Since one year prior to our visit she had complained of occasional urticaria with angioedema one week prior to menses, which resolved after menses. The lesions were accompanied by malaise, headache, and fatigue. The patient was asymptomatic between the outbreaks. She reported that she had been using various local corticosteroids, peroral antihistamines, and prednisone for the treatment of her skin lesions, but this treatment had not improved her symptoms. She suffered from mild seasonal rhinoconjunctivitis. We performed multiple laboratory tests that were unremarkable. Histopathological examination of a biopsy taken from a lesion on the neck showed epidermal hyperplasia and nonspecific mild dermal inflammation. Since progesterone was not available in aqueous solution in our country, we did not perform an intradermal test, but we performed a lymphocyte transformation test (LTT) to medroxyprogesterone and estradiol. The patient's lymphocytes showed markedly enhanced proliferation to medroxyprogesterone in vitro, while being negative to estradiol. We had performed control LTT in 10 healthy controls and 10 patients with atopy, and such hyperactivity was not observed in any of them. We performed an oral provocation test with OCP containing gestodene combined with ethinyloestradiol. Two days after commencing treatment, the patient developed widespread dermatitis (Figure 2) with nausea, malaise, and angioedema. The patient was informed about treatment options and possible side-effects. She started with OCP with the lowest amount of progesterone, containing ethinyloestradiol and dropirenone for treatment of APD, but terminated treatment after the second cycle due to a worsening of the skin lesions and urticaria accompanied with angioedema. At the time of writing, our patient continues to have premenstrual flares. The typical symptoms of APD are skin lesions such as eczema, erythema multiforme, prurigo, stomatitis, papulopustular lesions, folliculitis, urticaria, angioedema, and rarely anaphylaxis (2) that develop 3-10 days before and subside 1-2 days after menses, with recurrent cyclic aggravation (1,3,4). Frequently, patients have a history of exogenous progesterone intake (1,5,6), as in our patient, which could have resulted in antibody formation. The diagnosis of APD is established by an appropriate clinical history (premenstrual flare of skin lesions), a progesterone intradermal test, an intramuscular (7), oral (8), or intravaginal (1, 6) progesterone challenge test, and circulating antibodies to progesterone. Progesterone testing has not been standardized. Most of the sex hormones are not suitable for testing since they contain an oily component that can produce an irritant test reaction. Gestodene, which was used for the oral provocation test in our patient, is a potent progesterone (9). The LTT shows reactions to circulating lymphocytes and reflects immune reactions within the body. The goal of treatment is suppression of ovulation. Currently, the first-line choice of therapy is a combination oral contraceptive (3). We believe that OCP have a limited effect because all of them contain a progesterone component. If this treatment is ineffective, patients have been treated with danazol, gonadotropin releasing hormone analogs (3,4,6), conjugated estrogens (7), tamoxifen, oophorectomy (8), and progestogen desensitization (10) with varying success.

Join our facebook page

The most complete medicinal herbs database backed by science

  • Works in 55 languages
  • Herbal cures backed by science
  • Herbs recognition by image
  • Interactive GPS map - tag herbs on location (coming soon)
  • Read scientific publications related to your search
  • Search medicinal herbs by their effects
  • Organize your interests and stay up do date with the news research, clinical trials and patents

Type a symptom or a disease and read about herbs that might help, type a herb and see diseases and symptoms it is used against.
*All information is based on published scientific research

Google Play badgeApp Store badge