Value of non-invasive and invasive studies in patients with bundle branch block, syncope and history of myocardial infarction.

The prognosis of patients with bundle branch block (BBB) and myocardial infarction (MI) is poor, particularly for patients suffering from syncope. The purpose of this study was to investigate the diagnostic value of some techniques for the evaluation of the mechanism of syncope in patients with MI and BBB and their prognosis.

METHODS

We prospectively obtained the results of clinical history, 24 h Holter monitoring, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), signal-averaged ECG (SAECG) and programmed ventricular stimulation in 130 patients with syncope, MI and BBB. 81 of them had right (R)BBB and 49-left (L)BBB.

RESULTS

Ventricular tachycardia (VT) was identified as the main cause of syncope in patients with MI and BBB: 68% of them had inducible VT. The sensitivity (se) and specificity (sp) of non sustained VT on Holter monitoring for the detection of VT were respectively 42.5 and 47% in patients with RBBB, 62 and 36% in those with LBBB; se and sp of LVEF <40% were 67.5% and 65% in patients with RBBB, 85 and 9% in those with LBBB; se and sp of the combination of 2 of the 3 SAECG criteria, QRS duration > 155 ms, LAS duration >30 ms and RMS 40 < 17 microV were respectively 50 and 57% in patients with RBBB; se and sp of the combination of 2 of the 3 criteria QRS duration >165 ms, LAS duration >40 ms and RMS 40 <17 microV were 73 and 55.5%) in patients with LBBB. During the follow-up (4.7 years +/- 2.5), 12 patients died suddenly and 12 patients died from heart failure. Univariate and multivariate analysis revealed than only the induction of VT was a significant predictor of sudden death. A long QRS duration (> 165 ms) and induction of VT were independent predictors of total cardiac mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

Among noninvasive studies, only the determination of filtered QRS duration was a significant predictor of cardiac mortality in the case of a prolongation (> 165 ms). Sudden death was only predicted by the induction of sustained VT. Because of the high incidence of inducible sustained VT, the low value of Holter monitoring and decreased LVEF for the prediction of ventricular arrhythmias and the poor prognosis of patients with inducible VT and low LVEF, systematic programmed ventricular stimulation is indicated in patients with MI, syncope and BBB, whatever the non-invasive studies results.