English
Albanian
Arabic
Armenian
Azerbaijani
Belarusian
Bengali
Bosnian
Catalan
Czech
Danish
Deutsch
Dutch
English
Estonian
Finnish
Français
Greek
Haitian Creole
Hebrew
Hindi
Hungarian
Icelandic
Indonesian
Irish
Italian
Japanese
Korean
Latvian
Lithuanian
Macedonian
Mongolian
Norwegian
Persian
Polish
Portuguese
Romanian
Russian
Serbian
Slovak
Slovenian
Spanish
Swahili
Swedish
Turkish
Ukrainian
Vietnamese
Български
中文(简体)
中文(繁體)
Journal of Ethnopharmacology 2020-Feb

Analysis of the similarities and differences between Aucklandia Radix and Vlanimiriae Radix by fingerprint and chemometrics.

Only registered users can translate articles
Log In/Sign up
The link is saved to the clipboard
Ziqiang Chen
Qijuan Li
Ziwei Yu
Xiaomin Yan
Wenjun Wang
Yu Xie
Huiling Hu
Zhanguo Wang

Keywords

Abstract

Aucklandiae Radix (AR) and Vlanimiriae Radix (VR), as traditional Chinese medicine, have been included in many editions of Chinese Pharmacopoeia with similar efficacy such as promoting qi and relieving pain, which often used to treat chest, hypochondriac, abdominal fullness and pain, diarrhea and tenesmus. In most conditions, VR was used to be a substitute of AR or a local habit. However, whether VR could substitute for AR to play a same role in the formulation and clinical applications needed further study.In this study, similarities and differences between AR and VR would be assessed, and possible reasons that may influence the efficacy of the AR and VR would be explained from the perspective of chemical composition.HPLC-PAD was used to obtain the data of 10 batches of AR and VR, and to establish chemical fingerprint and chemometric analysis. UPLC-ESI-Q-TOF-MS was used to identify the structure of chemical ingredients.The chemical fingerprint results showed that 10 batches of AR and VR had a good similarity (>0.9) with 20 and 26 common chromatographic peaks respectively, and 20 batches of samples with 15 common chromatographic peaks also presented a good similarity (>0.9). Nevertheless, chemometric showed AR was distinct from VR and three chemical constituents, which leading to their differences, were identified by UPLC-ESI-Q-TOF-MS. The three chemical constituents were 3β-acetoxy-11β-guaia-4 (15), 10 (14)-diene-12,6α-olide, 10α,14-epoxy-11β-guaia-4 (15)-ene-12,6α-olide and costunolide, respectively.In general, AR and VR were highly similar, but their differences were deserved to attention, were existed among them. This research could provide reference for quality control and set a foundation for clinical applications of AR and VR.

Join our facebook page

The most complete medicinal herbs database backed by science

  • Works in 55 languages
  • Herbal cures backed by science
  • Herbs recognition by image
  • Interactive GPS map - tag herbs on location (coming soon)
  • Read scientific publications related to your search
  • Search medicinal herbs by their effects
  • Organize your interests and stay up do date with the news research, clinical trials and patents

Type a symptom or a disease and read about herbs that might help, type a herb and see diseases and symptoms it is used against.
*All information is based on published scientific research

Google Play badgeApp Store badge