Spanish
Albanian
Arabic
Armenian
Azerbaijani
Belarusian
Bengali
Bosnian
Catalan
Czech
Danish
Deutsch
Dutch
English
Estonian
Finnish
Français
Greek
Haitian Creole
Hebrew
Hindi
Hungarian
Icelandic
Indonesian
Irish
Italian
Japanese
Korean
Latvian
Lithuanian
Macedonian
Mongolian
Norwegian
Persian
Polish
Portuguese
Romanian
Russian
Serbian
Slovak
Slovenian
Spanish
Swahili
Swedish
Turkish
Ukrainian
Vietnamese
Български
中文(简体)
中文(繁體)
American Journal of Medicine 1992-Apr

A comparison of the safety and efficacy of lomefloxacin and ciprofloxacin in the treatment of complicated or recurrent urinary tract infections.

Solo los usuarios registrados pueden traducir artículos
Iniciar sesión Registrarse
El enlace se guarda en el portapapeles.
C E Cox

Palabras clave

Abstracto

The efficacy and safety of two fluoroquinolone antimicrobial agents, lomefloxacin and ciprofloxacin, were compared in a randomized, investigator-blinded, multiple-dose study that enrolled 150 adult outpatients with complicated or recurrent urinary tract infections. A total of 75 patients were treated with 400 mg of lomefloxacin once daily for 10-14 days; an equal number of patients received 500 mg of ciprofloxacin every 12 hours for 10-14 days. Both groups of patients were comparable in terms of demographics and distribution of underlying conditions. The most frequently occurring pathogens in both groups were Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae. A total of 142 patients met the criteria for efficacy evaluation, 72 in the lomefloxacin group and 70 in the ciprofloxacin group. Eradication of the initial pathogen (post-treatment culture of less than or equal to 10(4) colony-forming units (CFU)/mL) was noted in 97.2% of patients treated with lomefloxacin and in 95.7% of ciprofloxacin-treated patients. Clinical success (disappearance or amelioration of presenting signs and symptoms) occurred in 98.6% of lomefloxacin-treated patients and in 95.7% of patients treated with ciprofloxacin. The differences in outcome between the two treatment groups were not statistically significant. Both drug regimens were well tolerated. There were no clinically significant changes in clinical laboratory values during treatment. In the lomefloxacin group three patients reported nausea, one nervousness, and one pruritus; in the ciprofloxacin group, two patients reported nausea and three pruritus. Two lomefloxacin-treated patients (3%) and four patients treated with ciprofloxacin (5%) withdrew from treatment because of adverse events. A single daily dose of 400 mg lomefloxacin was comparable to 500 mg ciprofloxacin every 12 hours for the treatment of complicated or recurrent urinary tract infections.

Únete a nuestra
página de facebook

La base de datos de hierbas medicinales más completa respaldada por la ciencia

  • Funciona en 55 idiomas
  • Curas a base de hierbas respaldadas por la ciencia
  • Reconocimiento de hierbas por imagen
  • Mapa GPS interactivo: etiquete hierbas en la ubicación (próximamente)
  • Leer publicaciones científicas relacionadas con su búsqueda
  • Buscar hierbas medicinales por sus efectos.
  • Organice sus intereses y manténgase al día con las noticias de investigación, ensayos clínicos y patentes.

Escriba un síntoma o una enfermedad y lea acerca de las hierbas que podrían ayudar, escriba una hierba y vea las enfermedades y los síntomas contra los que se usa.
* Toda la información se basa en investigaciones científicas publicadas.

Google Play badgeApp Store badge