Spanish
Albanian
Arabic
Armenian
Azerbaijani
Belarusian
Bengali
Bosnian
Catalan
Czech
Danish
Deutsch
Dutch
English
Estonian
Finnish
Français
Greek
Haitian Creole
Hebrew
Hindi
Hungarian
Icelandic
Indonesian
Irish
Italian
Japanese
Korean
Latvian
Lithuanian
Macedonian
Mongolian
Norwegian
Persian
Polish
Portuguese
Romanian
Russian
Serbian
Slovak
Slovenian
Spanish
Swahili
Swedish
Turkish
Ukrainian
Vietnamese
Български
中文(简体)
中文(繁體)
Clinical Therapeutics

Multicenter comparative trial of ciprofloxacin versus cefuroxime axetil in the treatment of acute rhinosinusitis in a primary care setting. Rhinosinusitis Investigation Group.

Solo los usuarios registrados pueden traducir artículos
Iniciar sesión Registrarse
El enlace se guarda en el portapapeles.
M Weis
K Hendrick
G Tillotson
K Gravelle

Palabras clave

Abstracto

In a primary care setting, the efficacy and safety of ciprofloxacin (CIP) 500 mg b.i.d. were compared with those of cefuroxime axetil (CA) 250 mg b.i.d., each given for 10 days, in a nationwide, open, prospective, randomized trial of 1414 adults with acute sinusitis. Patients were enrolled if they had clinically documented acute sinusitis (ie, rhinosinusitis) (<4 weeks' duration), based on the 1997 American Academy of Otorhinolaryngology--Head and Neck Surgery criteria of either two major or one major and two minor symptoms. The primary efficacy variable was clinical response (resolution or failure) at the posttherapy assessment on study days 14 through 26. The most common presenting major signs and symptoms of acute rhinosinusitis were facial congestion, nasal drainage/purulence, facial pain/pressure, and nasal obstruction/blockage. The minor symptom, headache, was more common and severe than was nasal obstruction/blockage. A total of 1219 patients were clinically evaluable. Clinical resolution was observed in 559 of 613 (91.2%) CIP-treated patients and 546 of 606 (90. 1%) CA-treated patients. The two regimens were statistically equivalent (95% confidence interval, -2.16% to 4.71%). There were 80 drug-related adverse events reported in the CIP-treated patients and 81 drug-related adverse events reported in the CA-treated patients. The main adverse events were nausea (n = 18) and diarrhea (n = 7) in patients treated with CIP and diarrhea (n = 14), nausea (n = 12), headache (n = 7), and vaginitis (n = 7) in those treated with CA. CIP 500 mg b.i.d. was found to be statistically equivalent to CA 250 mg b.i.d. in the treatment of acute rhinosinusitis.

Únete a nuestra
página de facebook

La base de datos de hierbas medicinales más completa respaldada por la ciencia

  • Funciona en 55 idiomas
  • Curas a base de hierbas respaldadas por la ciencia
  • Reconocimiento de hierbas por imagen
  • Mapa GPS interactivo: etiquete hierbas en la ubicación (próximamente)
  • Leer publicaciones científicas relacionadas con su búsqueda
  • Buscar hierbas medicinales por sus efectos.
  • Organice sus intereses y manténgase al día con las noticias de investigación, ensayos clínicos y patentes.

Escriba un síntoma o una enfermedad y lea acerca de las hierbas que podrían ayudar, escriba una hierba y vea las enfermedades y los síntomas contra los que se usa.
* Toda la información se basa en investigaciones científicas publicadas.

Google Play badgeApp Store badge