Spanish
Albanian
Arabic
Armenian
Azerbaijani
Belarusian
Bengali
Bosnian
Catalan
Czech
Danish
Deutsch
Dutch
English
Estonian
Finnish
Français
Greek
Haitian Creole
Hebrew
Hindi
Hungarian
Icelandic
Indonesian
Irish
Italian
Japanese
Korean
Latvian
Lithuanian
Macedonian
Mongolian
Norwegian
Persian
Polish
Portuguese
Romanian
Russian
Serbian
Slovak
Slovenian
Spanish
Swahili
Swedish
Turkish
Ukrainian
Vietnamese
Български
中文(简体)
中文(繁體)
Current Eye Research 2014-Sep

Tonometry in corneal edema after cataract surgery: rebound versus goldmann applanation tonometry.

Solo los usuarios registrados pueden traducir artículos
Iniciar sesión Registrarse
El enlace se guarda en el portapapeles.
Matthias Fuest
Nikolaos Mamas
Peter Walter
Niklas Plange

Palabras clave

Abstracto

OBJECTIVE

Goldmann applanation tonometry (GAT) is known to be influenced by corneal properties, whereas the effect of corneal edema on intraocular pressure (IOP) measurement using Rebound tonometry (RT) is not clear. In this study, IOP was measured before and after cataract surgery using GAT and RT to investigate differences between methods and the effect of postsurgical corneal edema.

METHODS

Thirty patients with cataract were included in a prospective study. IOP was measured using GAT and RT (Icare PRO, Tiolat Oy, Finland) before and after one day of phacoemulsification. Central corneal thickness (CCT) was determined before and after surgery (Pentacam, Oculus, Germany).

RESULTS

CCT increased significantly after surgery by 52.2 ± 35.1 µm (p < 0.0001). IOP values of GAT and RT were significantly correlated before surgery (r = 0.65, p < 0.0001) and after surgery (r = 0.94, p < 0.0001). No significant correlation of GAT and RT to CCT before surgery (GAT: r = 0.18, p = 0.36; RT: r = 0.03, p = 0.87) or after surgery (GAT: r = -0.08, p = 0.69; RT: r = 0.17, p = 0.37) was found. The mean difference between GAT and RT (GAT-RT) was -1.0 ± 2.9 mmHg (range -6.2 to 6.4 mmHg, p = 0.08) before surgery and -1.1 ± 2.2 mmHg (range -5.1 to 4.8 mmHg, p = 0.01) after surgery. Before surgery, a positive correlation of GAT-RT with mean IOP of both methods is apparent (r = 0.45, p = 0.01). After surgery, no such correlation was found (r = -0.08, p = 0.69).

CONCLUSIONS

RT underestimates IOP in higher values and overestimates IOP in lower values compared to GAT before surgery. This is not apparent in eyes with corneal edema. Large differences between methods may be present in individual patients with and without corneal edema.

Únete a nuestra
página de facebook

La base de datos de hierbas medicinales más completa respaldada por la ciencia

  • Funciona en 55 idiomas
  • Curas a base de hierbas respaldadas por la ciencia
  • Reconocimiento de hierbas por imagen
  • Mapa GPS interactivo: etiquete hierbas en la ubicación (próximamente)
  • Leer publicaciones científicas relacionadas con su búsqueda
  • Buscar hierbas medicinales por sus efectos.
  • Organice sus intereses y manténgase al día con las noticias de investigación, ensayos clínicos y patentes.

Escriba un síntoma o una enfermedad y lea acerca de las hierbas que podrían ayudar, escriba una hierba y vea las enfermedades y los síntomas contra los que se usa.
* Toda la información se basa en investigaciones científicas publicadas.

Google Play badgeApp Store badge