Estonian
Albanian
Arabic
Armenian
Azerbaijani
Belarusian
Bengali
Bosnian
Catalan
Czech
Danish
Deutsch
Dutch
English
Estonian
Finnish
Français
Greek
Haitian Creole
Hebrew
Hindi
Hungarian
Icelandic
Indonesian
Irish
Italian
Japanese
Korean
Latvian
Lithuanian
Macedonian
Mongolian
Norwegian
Persian
Polish
Portuguese
Romanian
Russian
Serbian
Slovak
Slovenian
Spanish
Swahili
Swedish
Turkish
Ukrainian
Vietnamese
Български
中文(简体)
中文(繁體)
Journal of Otolaryngology of Japan 2013-Aug

[Endolymphatic hydrops detected with inner ear gd contrast-enhanced MRI; comparison between administration routes or with ECochG or glycerol test].

Ainult registreeritud kasutajad saavad artikleid tõlkida
Logi sisse
Link salvestatakse lõikelauale
Atsuhiko Uno
Arata Horii
Takao Imai
Yasuhiro Osaki
Takefumi Kamakura
Tadashi Kitahara
Yasumitsu Takimoto
Yumi Ohta
Tetsuo Morihana
Suetaka Nishiike

Märksõnad

Abstraktne

OBJECTIVE

Gadolinium (Gd) contrast-enhanced MRI has recently been introduced to clinical practice to detect endolymphatic hydrops. However, since the image depends on the hardware, pulse sequence or the way of Gd administration, the protocol and the evaluating criteria for hydrops on MRI have not yet been standardized. In this study, we assessed the usefulness of the hydrops detection by MRI following the intratympanic or intravenous Gd administration methods, and compared these findings with the electrocochleography and glycerol test.

METHODS

MRI was taken in 27 patients with Meniere's disease or delayed endolymphatic hydrops. All patients had frequent episodes of vertigo attacks which were clinically considered as of unilateral ear origin. Two types of Gd administration were used; injection into the tympanic cavity in 17 patients or intravenous injection in 10 patients. Axial 2D-FLAIR images were obtained with a 3.0T MRI unit, 24 and 4 h after intratympanic or intravenous administration, respectively. The endolymphatic space was detected as a low signal intensity area, while the surrounding perilymphatic space showed high intensity with Gd contrast. Those cases in which low signal areas corresponding to the cochlear duct could be clearly noticed, were classified as cochlear hydrops. When the greater part of the vestibule was occupied by a low signal area in more than half of the images, it was classified as vestibular hydrops.

RESULTS

Endolymphatic hydrops was detected in 88% (15/17 cases) by the intratympanic Gd administration method, and 90% (9/10) by the intravenous method. In the contralateral ears, 20% (2/10) showed hydrops, detected by the intravenous method. ECochG and the glycerol test were difficult when the hearing of the patient was severely impaired. Positive results of EcochG and the glycerol test were obtained only in 15 and 6 cases, respectively. However, as far as the waves could be obtained, ECochG showed a high detection rate of 88% (15/17) in the affected ear. In those cases in which both MRI and EcochG could be obtained, including both ears, the results were matched in 78% (21/27ears).

CONCLUSIONS

For the qualitative detection of hydrops, intratympanic and intravenous Gd administration methods were equivalent. Inner ear Gd contrast-enhanced MRI had higher efficacy in the detection of hydrops than the conventional tests.

Liitu meie
facebooki lehega

Kõige täiuslikum ravimtaimede andmebaas, mida toetab teadus

  • Töötab 55 keeles
  • Taimsed ravimid, mida toetab teadus
  • Maitsetaimede äratundmine pildi järgi
  • Interaktiivne GPS-kaart - märgistage ürdid asukohas (varsti)
  • Lugege oma otsinguga seotud teaduspublikatsioone
  • Otsige ravimtaimi nende mõju järgi
  • Korraldage oma huvisid ja hoidke end kursis uudisteuuringute, kliiniliste uuringute ja patentidega

Sisestage sümptom või haigus ja lugege ravimtaimede kohta, mis võivad aidata, tippige ürdi ja vaadake haigusi ja sümptomeid, mille vastu seda kasutatakse.
* Kogu teave põhineb avaldatud teaduslikel uuringutel

Google Play badgeApp Store badge