Estonian
Albanian
Arabic
Armenian
Azerbaijani
Belarusian
Bengali
Bosnian
Catalan
Czech
Danish
Deutsch
Dutch
English
Estonian
Finnish
Français
Greek
Haitian Creole
Hebrew
Hindi
Hungarian
Icelandic
Indonesian
Irish
Italian
Japanese
Korean
Latvian
Lithuanian
Macedonian
Mongolian
Norwegian
Persian
Polish
Portuguese
Romanian
Russian
Serbian
Slovak
Slovenian
Spanish
Swahili
Swedish
Turkish
Ukrainian
Vietnamese
Български
中文(简体)
中文(繁體)
Journal of Voice 2013-Mar

KTP 532 nm laser for laryngeal lesions. a systematic review.

Ainult registreeritud kasutajad saavad artikleid tõlkida
Logi sisse
Link salvestatakse lõikelauale
Xuanqian Xie
Jonathan Young
Karen Kost
Maurice McGregor

Märksõnad

Abstraktne

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of the 532 nm potassium titanyl phosphate (KTP) laser for vocal fold surgery.

METHODS

Systematic literature review.

METHODS

Our systematic review was conducted using the meta-analysis of observational studies in epidemiology guidelines. We applied the criteria of the Oxford Centre for Evidence-based Medicine to assess the level of evidence.

RESULTS

We identified seven observational studies of eight case series, which reported a total of 243 KTP procedures carried out for vocal fold lesions: two series each concerning ectasias and varices, early glottic cancer, and recurrent papillomatosis, and one series each for keratosis with dysplasia and various benign laryngeal pathologies. There was also a retrospective review of the use of KTP laser in 387 endoscopic laryngeal surgeries. No studies compared the use of KTP laser with that of other technologies. Thus, according to the Oxford criteria, there is only level 4 evidence of KTP's efficacy and safety. In selected cases, the KTP instrument can be used without general anesthesia in the clinic setting.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of KTP laser for laryngeal surgery is still relatively innovative. Several surgeons have found KTP laser to be the equivalent of, or superior to, the CO2 or pulsed dye lasers, and none have reported inferiority. However, there are currently no published data to support these conclusions. To establish equality/superiority, it is desirable that further evidence of efficacy and safety be obtained, either through randomized controlled trials or at least through well-documented prospective observational studies with reporting of all relevant input and outcome data.

Liitu meie
facebooki lehega

Kõige täiuslikum ravimtaimede andmebaas, mida toetab teadus

  • Töötab 55 keeles
  • Taimsed ravimid, mida toetab teadus
  • Maitsetaimede äratundmine pildi järgi
  • Interaktiivne GPS-kaart - märgistage ürdid asukohas (varsti)
  • Lugege oma otsinguga seotud teaduspublikatsioone
  • Otsige ravimtaimi nende mõju järgi
  • Korraldage oma huvisid ja hoidke end kursis uudisteuuringute, kliiniliste uuringute ja patentidega

Sisestage sümptom või haigus ja lugege ravimtaimede kohta, mis võivad aidata, tippige ürdi ja vaadake haigusi ja sümptomeid, mille vastu seda kasutatakse.
* Kogu teave põhineb avaldatud teaduslikel uuringutel

Google Play badgeApp Store badge