Estonian
Albanian
Arabic
Armenian
Azerbaijani
Belarusian
Bengali
Bosnian
Catalan
Czech
Danish
Deutsch
Dutch
English
Estonian
Finnish
Français
Greek
Haitian Creole
Hebrew
Hindi
Hungarian
Icelandic
Indonesian
Irish
Italian
Japanese
Korean
Latvian
Lithuanian
Macedonian
Mongolian
Norwegian
Persian
Polish
Portuguese
Romanian
Russian
Serbian
Slovak
Slovenian
Spanish
Swahili
Swedish
Turkish
Ukrainian
Vietnamese
Български
中文(简体)
中文(繁體)
Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology 2020-Feb

Dronedarone treatment following cardioversion in patients with atrial fibrillation/flutter: a post hoc analysis of the EURIDIS and ADONIS trials.

Ainult registreeritud kasutajad saavad artikleid tõlkida
Logi sisse
Link salvestatakse lõikelauale
Munveer Thind
Harry Crijns
Gerald Naccarelli
James Reiffel
Valérie Genti
Mattias Wieloch
Andrew Koren
Peter Kowey

Märksõnad

Abstraktne

The phase 3 EURIDIS and ADONIS studies evaluated dronedarone for atrial fibrillation (AF)/atrial flutter (AFL) recurrence in patients with non-permanent AF. Here we assessed whether patient characteristics and/or treatment outcomes in these studies differed based on need for cardioversion before randomization.Time to adjudicated first AF/AFL recurrence, symptomatic recurrence, cardiovascular hospitalization/death, and AF hospitalization, and safety were assessed by cardioversion status.Of 1237 patients randomized (2:1 dronedarone:placebo), 364 required baseline cardioversion (dronedarone 243, placebo 121). Patients requiring cardioversion had a greater prevalence of cardiovascular comorbidities and shorter times to first AF/AFL recurrence compared with those not requiring cardioversion. Dronedarone was associated with longer median time to first AF/AFL recurrence vs placebo regardless of cardioversion status (cardioversion: 50 vs 15 days, hazard ratio [HR] 0.76; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.59-0.97; P = 0.02; non-cardioversion: 150 vs 77 days, HR 0.76; 95% CI, 0.64-0.90; P < 0.01). Dronedarone was similarly associated with prolonged median time to symptomatic recurrence vs placebo in the cardioversion (347 vs 87 days, HR 0.65; 95% CI, 0.49-0.87) and non-cardioversion (288 vs 120 days, HR 0.74; 95% CI, 0.62-0.90) populations. Risk of cardiovascular hospitalization/death and first AF hospitalization was lower with dronedarone vs placebo regardless of cardioversion status, but differences were not statistically significant. Safety of dronedarone was similar in both groups.Patients requiring baseline cardioversion represent a distinct population, having more underlying cardiovascular disease and experiencing shorter time to AF/AFL recurrences. Dronedarone was associated with improved efficacy vs placebo regardless of cardioversion status. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

Liitu meie
facebooki lehega

Kõige täiuslikum ravimtaimede andmebaas, mida toetab teadus

  • Töötab 55 keeles
  • Taimsed ravimid, mida toetab teadus
  • Maitsetaimede äratundmine pildi järgi
  • Interaktiivne GPS-kaart - märgistage ürdid asukohas (varsti)
  • Lugege oma otsinguga seotud teaduspublikatsioone
  • Otsige ravimtaimi nende mõju järgi
  • Korraldage oma huvisid ja hoidke end kursis uudisteuuringute, kliiniliste uuringute ja patentidega

Sisestage sümptom või haigus ja lugege ravimtaimede kohta, mis võivad aidata, tippige ürdi ja vaadake haigusi ja sümptomeid, mille vastu seda kasutatakse.
* Kogu teave põhineb avaldatud teaduslikel uuringutel

Google Play badgeApp Store badge