Persian
Albanian
Arabic
Armenian
Azerbaijani
Belarusian
Bengali
Bosnian
Catalan
Czech
Danish
Deutsch
Dutch
English
Estonian
Finnish
Français
Greek
Haitian Creole
Hebrew
Hindi
Hungarian
Icelandic
Indonesian
Irish
Italian
Japanese
Korean
Latvian
Lithuanian
Macedonian
Mongolian
Norwegian
Persian
Polish
Portuguese
Romanian
Russian
Serbian
Slovak
Slovenian
Spanish
Swahili
Swedish
Turkish
Ukrainian
Vietnamese
Български
中文(简体)
中文(繁體)
International Journal of General Medicine 2012

Addressing the management of atrial fibrillation - a systematic review of the role of dronedarone.

فقط کاربران ثبت نام شده می توانند مقالات را ترجمه کنند
ورود به سیستم / ثبت نام
پیوند در کلیپ بورد ذخیره می شود
Gian Marco Podda
Giovanni Casazza
Francesco Casella
Franca Dipaola
Emanuela Scannella
Ludovica Tagliabue

کلید واژه ها

خلاصه

BACKGROUND

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common sustained arrhythmia. It occurs in 1%-2% of the general population and its prevalence increases with age. Dronedarone, a noniodinated benzofuran similar to amiodarone, was developed as an antiarrhythmic agent for patients with atrial fibrillation. The aim of our systematic review was to critically evaluate randomized controlled trials that compared treatment with dronedarone versus placebo or amiodarone in patients with atrial fibrillation.

METHODS

Electronic databases (MEDLINE, Embase, and Central) were searched up to November 2011 with no language restrictions. We included randomized controlled trials in which dronedarone was compared to placebo or other drugs in patients with AF. Internal and external validity was assessed.

RESULTS

We identified seven papers corresponding to eight randomized controlled trials. The DAFNE, EURIDIS/ADONIS, and ATHENA trials demonstrated a reduction of AF recurrence with dronedarone as compared to placebo in patients with nonpermanent AF. The DIONYSOS study showed that dronedarone is less effective for the prevention of recurrent AF but improved tolerability as compared to amiodarone. Considering patients with permanent AF, the ERATO trial showed that dronedarone had rate-control effects while the PALLAS study was stopped early since stroke, myocardial infarction, systemic embolism, or death from cardiovascular causes were significantly more frequent in subjects treated with dronedarone as compared to placebo. The ANDROMEDA trial included patients with recent hospitalization for heart failure and was terminated early because of excess of deaths in the dronedarone group.

CONCLUSIONS

Like most antiarrhythmic drugs, dronedarone reduces the recurrence of AF in patients with paroxysmal or persistent AF as compared to placebo. However, relapse rates in the first year of therapy are high. Moreover, dronedarone showed to be less effective than amiodarone. Finally, dronedarone should be avoided in patients with permanent AF and a high risk for cardiovascular events or severe congestive heart failure.

به صفحه فیس بوک ما بپیوندید

کاملترین پایگاه داده گیاهان دارویی با پشتیبانی علمی

  • به 55 زبان کار می کند
  • درمان های گیاهی با پشتوانه علم
  • شناسایی گیاهان توسط تصویر
  • نقشه GPS تعاملی - گیاهان را در مکان نشان دهید (به زودی)
  • انتشارات علمی مربوط به جستجوی خود را بخوانید
  • گیاهان دارویی را با توجه به اثرات آنها جستجو کنید
  • علایق خود را سازماندهی کنید و با تحقیقات اخبار ، آزمایشات بالینی و حق ثبت اختراع در جریان باشید

علامت یا بیماری را تایپ کنید و در مورد گیاهانی که ممکن است به شما کمک کنند ، بخوانید ، یک گیاه تایپ کنید و بیماری ها و علائمی را که در برابر آن استفاده می شود ، ببینید.
* کلیه اطلاعات براساس تحقیقات علمی منتشر شده است

Google Play badgeApp Store badge