Persian
Albanian
Arabic
Armenian
Azerbaijani
Belarusian
Bengali
Bosnian
Catalan
Czech
Danish
Deutsch
Dutch
English
Estonian
Finnish
Français
Greek
Haitian Creole
Hebrew
Hindi
Hungarian
Icelandic
Indonesian
Irish
Italian
Japanese
Korean
Latvian
Lithuanian
Macedonian
Mongolian
Norwegian
Persian
Polish
Portuguese
Romanian
Russian
Serbian
Slovak
Slovenian
Spanish
Swahili
Swedish
Turkish
Ukrainian
Vietnamese
Български
中文(简体)
中文(繁體)
Annals of Allergy, Asthma and Immunology 2001-Oct

Five days of cefprozil versus 10 days of clarithromycin in the treatment of an acute exacerbation of chronic bronchitis.

فقط کاربران ثبت نام شده می توانند مقالات را ترجمه کنند
ورود به سیستم / ثبت نام
پیوند در کلیپ بورد ذخیره می شود
J M McCarty
P F Pierce

کلید واژه ها

خلاصه

BACKGROUND

Shorter than traditional 7- to 14-day treatment regimens have demonstrated efficacy in treatment of an acute exacerbation of chronic bronchitis (AECB).

OBJECTIVE

Perform a clinical efficacy study comparing 5 days of cefprozil therapy to 10 days of clarithromycin in treating an AECB.

METHODS

A multicenter, randomized, double-blind study comparing efficacy and safety of cefprozil, 500 mg twice daily, for 5 days with clarithromycin, 500 mg twice daily, for 10 days in treatment of 295 subjects with AECB. Concomitantly, among all treated subjects, 39% (115 of 295) had a history of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease/emphysema; 21% (62 of 295) had a history of asthma/reactive airway disease; and 31% (90 of 295) had environmental allergies.

RESULTS

There were no statistically significant differences among clinically evaluable subjects' cure rates; 82% (109 of 133) treated with cefprozil versus 85% (105 of 123) treated with clarithromycin were cured at test-of-cure visit (95% confidence interval, -12.0 to 5.1%). Clinical cure rates at end of study were 80% and 81%, respectively (95% confidence interval, -10.8 to 7.9%). Before treatment, 99% (85 of 86) of Gram-positive organisms isolated were susceptible to cefprozil and 78% (67 of 86) were susceptible to clarithromycin. A total of 84% (96 of 114) of Gram-negative organisms were susceptible to cefprozil and 63% (72 of 114) were susceptible to clarithromycin. Of clinically evaluable Streptococcus pneumoniae-infected subjects, 100% (11 of 11) of cefprozil subjects and 93% (14 of 15) of clarithromycin subjects experienced clinical cure. The most frequently reported adverse effects were nausea, 5% (7 of 150), and diarrhea, 9% (14 of 150), for cefprozil. For clarithromycin, the adverse effects were nausea, 8% (11 of 145); diarrhea, 12% (18 of 145); taste perversion, 8% (11 of 145); and dry mouth, 5% (7 of 145).

CONCLUSIONS

Five days of cefprozil is as effective as 10 days of clarithromycin for treatment of an AECB.

به صفحه فیس بوک ما بپیوندید

کاملترین پایگاه داده گیاهان دارویی با پشتیبانی علمی

  • به 55 زبان کار می کند
  • درمان های گیاهی با پشتوانه علم
  • شناسایی گیاهان توسط تصویر
  • نقشه GPS تعاملی - گیاهان را در مکان نشان دهید (به زودی)
  • انتشارات علمی مربوط به جستجوی خود را بخوانید
  • گیاهان دارویی را با توجه به اثرات آنها جستجو کنید
  • علایق خود را سازماندهی کنید و با تحقیقات اخبار ، آزمایشات بالینی و حق ثبت اختراع در جریان باشید

علامت یا بیماری را تایپ کنید و در مورد گیاهانی که ممکن است به شما کمک کنند ، بخوانید ، یک گیاه تایپ کنید و بیماری ها و علائمی را که در برابر آن استفاده می شود ، ببینید.
* کلیه اطلاعات براساس تحقیقات علمی منتشر شده است

Google Play badgeApp Store badge