Applying sequential surveillance methods that use regression adjustment or weighting to control confounding in a multisite, rare-event, distributed setting: Part 2 in-depth example of a reanalysis of the measles-mumps-rubella-varicella combination vaccine and seizure risk.
Vain rekisteröityneet käyttäjät voivat kääntää artikkeleita
In-depth example of two new group sequential methods for postmarket safety monitoring of new medical products.Existing trial-based group sequential approaches have been extended to adjust for confounders, accommodate rare events, and address privacy-related constraints on data sharing. Most adaptations have involved design-based confounder strategies, for example, self-controlled or exposure matching, while analysis-based approaches like regression and weighting have received less attention. We describe the methodology of two new group sequential approaches that use analysis-based confounder adjustment (GS GEE) and weighting (GS IPTW). Using data from the Food and Drug Administration's Sentinel network, we apply both methods in the context of a known positive association: the measles-mumps-rubella-varicella vaccine and seizure risk in infants.Estimates from both new approaches were similar and comparable to prior studies using design-based methods to address confounding. The time to detection of a safety signal was considerably shorter for GS IPTW, which estimates a risk difference, compared to GS GEE, which provides relative estimates of excess risk.Future group sequential safety surveillance efforts should consider analysis-based confounder adjustment techniques that evaluate safety signals on the risk difference scale to achieve greater statistical power and more timely results.
Järjestä kiinnostuksesi ja pysy ajan tasalla uutisista, kliinisistä tutkimuksista ja patenteista
Kirjoita oire tai sairaus ja lue yrtteistä, jotka saattavat auttaa, kirjoita yrtti ja näe taudit ja oireet, joita vastaan sitä käytetään. * Kaikki tiedot perustuvat julkaistuun tieteelliseen tutkimukseen