Finnish
Albanian
Arabic
Armenian
Azerbaijani
Belarusian
Bengali
Bosnian
Catalan
Czech
Danish
Deutsch
Dutch
English
Estonian
Finnish
Français
Greek
Haitian Creole
Hebrew
Hindi
Hungarian
Icelandic
Indonesian
Irish
Italian
Japanese
Korean
Latvian
Lithuanian
Macedonian
Mongolian
Norwegian
Persian
Polish
Portuguese
Romanian
Russian
Serbian
Slovak
Slovenian
Spanish
Swahili
Swedish
Turkish
Ukrainian
Vietnamese
Български
中文(简体)
中文(繁體)
Cancer Treatment Reviews 2008-Nov

Hyperbaric oxygenation for tumour sensitisation to radiotherapy: a systematic review of randomised controlled trials.

Vain rekisteröityneet käyttäjät voivat kääntää artikkeleita
Kirjaudu sisään Rekisteröidy
Linkki tallennetaan leikepöydälle
M Bennett
J Feldmeier
R Smee
C Milross

Avainsanat

Abstrakti

BACKGROUND

Radiotherapy is a well-established treatment for some solid tumours. Hyperbaric oxygenation (HBO) may improve radiotherapeutic killing of hypoxic cancer cells, so the simultaneous administration of radiotherapy and HBO may reduce mortality and tumour recurrence.

METHODS

We performed a systematic search of the literature in September 2007 for randomised controlled trials, and made pooled analyses of pre-determined clinical outcomes.

RESULTS

Nineteen trials contributed to this review (2286 patients). There was a reduction in mortality for head and neck cancers at one and five years after therapy (at five years RR 0.82, P=0.03, NNT=5), and improved local tumour control at three months (RR 0.58, P=0.006, NNT=7). Any advantage is achieved at the cost of an increased rate of both severe radiation tissue injury (RR 2.35, P<0.0001, NNH=8) and the chance of seizures during therapy (RR 6.76, P=0.03, NNH=22).

CONCLUSIONS

There is some evidence that HBO improves local tumour control and mortality for cancers of the head and neck, and local tumour recurrence in cancers of the uterine cervix. These benefits may only occur with unusual fractionation schemes. HBO is associated with significant adverse effects including oxygen toxic seizures and severe radiation tissue injury. The methodological and reporting inadequacies of the studies included in this review demand a cautious interpretation. More research is needed for head, neck and uterine cervical cancer, but is probably not justified for bladder cancer. There is little evidence available concerning malignancies at other sites.

Liity facebook-sivullemme

Täydellisin lääketieteellinen tietokanta tieteen tukemana

  • Toimii 55 kielellä
  • Yrttilääkkeet tieteen tukemana
  • Yrttien tunnistaminen kuvan perusteella
  • Interaktiivinen GPS-kartta - merkitse yrtit sijaintiin (tulossa pian)
  • Lue hakuusi liittyviä tieteellisiä julkaisuja
  • Hae lääkekasveja niiden vaikutusten perusteella
  • Järjestä kiinnostuksesi ja pysy ajan tasalla uutisista, kliinisistä tutkimuksista ja patenteista

Kirjoita oire tai sairaus ja lue yrtteistä, jotka saattavat auttaa, kirjoita yrtti ja näe taudit ja oireet, joita vastaan sitä käytetään.
* Kaikki tiedot perustuvat julkaistuun tieteelliseen tutkimukseen

Google Play badgeApp Store badge