Finnish
Albanian
Arabic
Armenian
Azerbaijani
Belarusian
Bengali
Bosnian
Catalan
Czech
Danish
Deutsch
Dutch
English
Estonian
Finnish
Français
Greek
Haitian Creole
Hebrew
Hindi
Hungarian
Icelandic
Indonesian
Irish
Italian
Japanese
Korean
Latvian
Lithuanian
Macedonian
Mongolian
Norwegian
Persian
Polish
Portuguese
Romanian
Russian
Serbian
Slovak
Slovenian
Spanish
Swahili
Swedish
Turkish
Ukrainian
Vietnamese
Български
中文(简体)
中文(繁體)
American Journal of Clinical Oncology: Cancer Clinical Trials 1992-Feb

Induction chemotherapy for advanced head and neck cancer: modification of response to chemotherapy by antiemetics.

Vain rekisteröityneet käyttäjät voivat kääntää artikkeleita
Kirjaudu sisään Rekisteröidy
Linkki tallennetaan leikepöydälle
R M White
E M Myers
E Ashayeri
R V Gumbs
R Pressoir

Avainsanat

Abstrakti

Forty Stage IV head and neck cancer patients were entered on a multimodality trial of induction chemotherapy (cisplatin + infusional 5-fluorouracil), surgery, and radiation. During chemotherapy, the patients of Group A (the first 19 patients) were medicated with metoclopramide. The patients of Group B (the next 21 patients) were medicated with droperidol. The groups were comparable. The response rate (complete + partial) was 32% for Group A and 52% for Group B (p = 0.16). Primary site (p = 0.08) and surgical margin (p = 0.005) clearance of tumor were better in Group B. Nodal disease responded poorly to chemotherapy in both groups. Tumor necrosis (p = 0.006) and granulation tissue (p = 0.07) were reduced in surgical specimens after chemotherapy in Group B. The drugs were well tolerated with reversible toxicity; nausea/vomiting (p = 0.01) and weight loss (p = 0.07) after chemotherapy, were increased in Group B. The 2-year survival was 26% for Group A and 62% for Group B (p = 0.027). The median survival was 15 months for Group A and 33 months for Group B (p = 0.05). Progression-free survival improved in Group B (p greater than 0.17). These improvements in response and survival did not appear to reflect changes in surgical or radiotherapy management, but may have reflected an uninhibited effect of cisplatin in Group B. It is theorized that the metabisulfite formulated with metoclopramide altered the pharmacokinetics or pharmacodynamics of cisplatin. This resulted in the poor response to chemotherapy and poor survival in Group A. An analysis of a randomized trial comparing metoclopramide (formulated with metabisulfite) versus a control antiemetic can confirm the data presented in this pilot study. Overall, our patients survived as well as others in comparable multimodality studies in Europe and the United States.

Liity facebook-sivullemme

Täydellisin lääketieteellinen tietokanta tieteen tukemana

  • Toimii 55 kielellä
  • Yrttilääkkeet tieteen tukemana
  • Yrttien tunnistaminen kuvan perusteella
  • Interaktiivinen GPS-kartta - merkitse yrtit sijaintiin (tulossa pian)
  • Lue hakuusi liittyviä tieteellisiä julkaisuja
  • Hae lääkekasveja niiden vaikutusten perusteella
  • Järjestä kiinnostuksesi ja pysy ajan tasalla uutisista, kliinisistä tutkimuksista ja patenteista

Kirjoita oire tai sairaus ja lue yrtteistä, jotka saattavat auttaa, kirjoita yrtti ja näe taudit ja oireet, joita vastaan sitä käytetään.
* Kaikki tiedot perustuvat julkaistuun tieteelliseen tutkimukseen

Google Play badgeApp Store badge