Finnish
Albanian
Arabic
Armenian
Azerbaijani
Belarusian
Bengali
Bosnian
Catalan
Czech
Danish
Deutsch
Dutch
English
Estonian
Finnish
Français
Greek
Haitian Creole
Hebrew
Hindi
Hungarian
Icelandic
Indonesian
Irish
Italian
Japanese
Korean
Latvian
Lithuanian
Macedonian
Mongolian
Norwegian
Persian
Polish
Portuguese
Romanian
Russian
Serbian
Slovak
Slovenian
Spanish
Swahili
Swedish
Turkish
Ukrainian
Vietnamese
Български
中文(简体)
中文(繁體)
Microscopy Research and Technique 2004-Feb

Methods for determining the composition of nasal fluid by X-ray microanalysis.

Vain rekisteröityneet käyttäjät voivat kääntää artikkeleita
Kirjaudu sisään Rekisteröidy
Linkki tallennetaan leikepöydälle
Viengphet Vanthanouvong
Godfried M Roomans

Avainsanat

Abstrakti

The nasal fluid is an easily accessible form of airway surface liquid. The objective of this study was to find a technically easy and reproducible method for sampling and analysis of this fluid. In a pilot study, several methods to carry out X-ray microanalysis of sub-microliter droplets were compared. Acceptable results were obtained with several of these methods (pipeting on filter paper or analysis of frozen-hydrated droplets at low temperature). Nasal fluid was collected from the inferior turbinate with a micropipette after occlusion of a nostril for 5-10 minutes. Ion concentrations in nasal fluid from six control subjects were (in mM, mean +/- standard error): sodium (Na) 127 +/- 6, chloride (Cl) 140 +/- 7, potassium (K) 27 +/- 3, and calcium (Ca) 5 +/- 1. This sampling method proved difficult to apply to cystic fibrosis (CF) patients because of the viscous quality of their nasal secretion. Therefore, an alternative method was devised. Sephadex G-25, ion exchange beads were mounted on double-sided tape, which was stuck on a filter paper as support. The filter paper was applied for 10 minutes to the nostril of a subject, and kept loosely in place. During the exposure period, the nasal fluid equilibrates with the beads. After removal of the filter paper with the beads from the nostril, the beads were rinsed with a hydrophobic volatile silicone oil to remove excess nasal fluid, dried, and analyzed. This method of collection is not cumbersome for the subject and gives results similar to those obtained by the direct collection method: Na 142 +/- 28 mM, Cl 150 +/- 36 mM, K 43 +/- 10 mM (mean and standard error of four determinations). Small differences between the filter method and the bead method can be explained by the fact that the filter method measured total nasal fluid, whereas the bead method measures predominantly the fluid component. Subjects suffering from mild respiratory illness or rhinitis had higher values for Na, K, and Cl in their nasal fluid.

Liity facebook-sivullemme

Täydellisin lääketieteellinen tietokanta tieteen tukemana

  • Toimii 55 kielellä
  • Yrttilääkkeet tieteen tukemana
  • Yrttien tunnistaminen kuvan perusteella
  • Interaktiivinen GPS-kartta - merkitse yrtit sijaintiin (tulossa pian)
  • Lue hakuusi liittyviä tieteellisiä julkaisuja
  • Hae lääkekasveja niiden vaikutusten perusteella
  • Järjestä kiinnostuksesi ja pysy ajan tasalla uutisista, kliinisistä tutkimuksista ja patenteista

Kirjoita oire tai sairaus ja lue yrtteistä, jotka saattavat auttaa, kirjoita yrtti ja näe taudit ja oireet, joita vastaan sitä käytetään.
* Kaikki tiedot perustuvat julkaistuun tieteelliseen tutkimukseen

Google Play badgeApp Store badge