Finnish
Albanian
Arabic
Armenian
Azerbaijani
Belarusian
Bengali
Bosnian
Catalan
Czech
Danish
Deutsch
Dutch
English
Estonian
Finnish
Français
Greek
Haitian Creole
Hebrew
Hindi
Hungarian
Icelandic
Indonesian
Irish
Italian
Japanese
Korean
Latvian
Lithuanian
Macedonian
Mongolian
Norwegian
Persian
Polish
Portuguese
Romanian
Russian
Serbian
Slovak
Slovenian
Spanish
Swahili
Swedish
Turkish
Ukrainian
Vietnamese
Български
中文(简体)
中文(繁體)
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 2014-Jul

Risk assessment of applicators to chlorpyrifos through dermal contact and inhalation at different maize plant heights in China.

Vain rekisteröityneet käyttäjät voivat kääntää artikkeleita
Kirjaudu sisään Rekisteröidy
Linkki tallennetaan leikepöydälle
Xuehua An
Xiaofeng Ji
Min Wu
Xiuqing Hu
Ruixian Yu
Xueping Zhao
Leiming Cai

Avainsanat

Abstrakti

Dermal and respiratory exposure assessments and risk assessment for applicators were performed with 48% chlorpyrifos EC. The chlorpyrifos was applied with lever-operated knapsacks under three spraying environments, namely, average maize field heights of 62 cm (A1), 108 cm (A2), and 212 cm (A3). The whole body dosimetry technique was applied to collect dermal exposure samples including cotton protective garments, gloves, socks, and hats. A personal air monitor equipped with an XAD-2 resin was used for respiratory exposure assessment. Without personal protective equipment (PPE) the total potential dermal exposure (PDE) was 27.8, 90.6, and 462.1 mL h(-1) under A1, A2, and A3 spraying environments, respectively. In addition, with the change in the maize plant height, the major exposure parts on the applicators were also different. Under single-layer garment and glove protection circumstances, internal dermal exposure (IDE) was 3.37 mL h(-1) for A1, 4.28 mL h(-1) for A2, and 18.32 mL h(-1) for A3. Potential inhalation exposure (PIE) was detected in A3, but it was not detected in A1 and A2. For risk assessment, the margin of safety (MOS) was calculated from the PDE or IDE and PIE. The MOS values for the three spraying environments were <1 under no PPE and single-layer garment and glove protection circumstances, indicating high possibility of health risk. However, with double protective garments, the MOS values for A1 and A2 cases were all >1, but the MOS was <1 in the A3 case.

Liity facebook-sivullemme

Täydellisin lääketieteellinen tietokanta tieteen tukemana

  • Toimii 55 kielellä
  • Yrttilääkkeet tieteen tukemana
  • Yrttien tunnistaminen kuvan perusteella
  • Interaktiivinen GPS-kartta - merkitse yrtit sijaintiin (tulossa pian)
  • Lue hakuusi liittyviä tieteellisiä julkaisuja
  • Hae lääkekasveja niiden vaikutusten perusteella
  • Järjestä kiinnostuksesi ja pysy ajan tasalla uutisista, kliinisistä tutkimuksista ja patenteista

Kirjoita oire tai sairaus ja lue yrtteistä, jotka saattavat auttaa, kirjoita yrtti ja näe taudit ja oireet, joita vastaan sitä käytetään.
* Kaikki tiedot perustuvat julkaistuun tieteelliseen tutkimukseen

Google Play badgeApp Store badge