Finnish
Albanian
Arabic
Armenian
Azerbaijani
Belarusian
Bengali
Bosnian
Catalan
Czech
Danish
Deutsch
Dutch
English
Estonian
Finnish
Français
Greek
Haitian Creole
Hebrew
Hindi
Hungarian
Icelandic
Indonesian
Irish
Italian
Japanese
Korean
Latvian
Lithuanian
Macedonian
Mongolian
Norwegian
Persian
Polish
Portuguese
Romanian
Russian
Serbian
Slovak
Slovenian
Spanish
Swahili
Swedish
Turkish
Ukrainian
Vietnamese
Български
中文(简体)
中文(繁體)
Neurourology and Urodynamics 2020-Sep

The role of perioperative medications in urinary retention following midurethral sling

Vain rekisteröityneet käyttäjät voivat kääntää artikkeleita
Kirjaudu sisään Rekisteröidy
Linkki tallennetaan leikepöydälle
Eric Katz
Kristian Stensland
Kareem Alazem
Lara MacLachlan

Avainsanat

Abstrakti

Aims: Postoperative urinary retention (PUR) is a known complication of midurethral sling (MUS) placement. The use of certain perioperative medications may influence the risk of this complication. This study aimed to investigate the association of perioperative medications with urinary retention after MUS.

Methods: This was a retrospective study of women undergoing MUS placement for stress urinary incontinence by a fellowship-trained urologic surgeon between 2015 and 2018, under approval by the Institutional Review Board. Both retropubic and transobturator approaches were included. All patients underwent an active void trial following surgery. Intraoperative medications given by the anesthesia team were retrospectively noted. The Fisher's exact test was used to compare the association of PUR with categorical variables.

Results: A total of 82 patients were included, 17 (21%) of whom failed postoperative void trial due to urinary retention. Of 25 patients receiving perioperative scopolamine, 40% failed the postoperative void trial, compared to 12% of patients not receiving scopolamine (p = .048). Groups were then stratified based on scopolamine use due to the observed independent association with PUR. Subgroup analysis revealed a stronger association of postoperative retention with scopolamine in patients undergoing concomitant prolapse surgery. Notably, retention rate and scopolamine use were similar whether patients underwent sling placement alone or in combination with prolapse surgery. Rate of retention was also higher for retropubic versus transobturator slings (36% vs. 9%; p = .005).

Conclusions: Perioperative scopolamine may be associated with an increased risk of postoperative urinary retention following MUS, especially in the setting of a concomitant prolapse surgery.

Keywords: female sling; pelvic organ prolapse; scopolamine; stress incontinence; urinary retention.

Liity facebook-sivullemme

Täydellisin lääketieteellinen tietokanta tieteen tukemana

  • Toimii 55 kielellä
  • Yrttilääkkeet tieteen tukemana
  • Yrttien tunnistaminen kuvan perusteella
  • Interaktiivinen GPS-kartta - merkitse yrtit sijaintiin (tulossa pian)
  • Lue hakuusi liittyviä tieteellisiä julkaisuja
  • Hae lääkekasveja niiden vaikutusten perusteella
  • Järjestä kiinnostuksesi ja pysy ajan tasalla uutisista, kliinisistä tutkimuksista ja patenteista

Kirjoita oire tai sairaus ja lue yrtteistä, jotka saattavat auttaa, kirjoita yrtti ja näe taudit ja oireet, joita vastaan sitä käytetään.
* Kaikki tiedot perustuvat julkaistuun tieteelliseen tutkimukseen

Google Play badgeApp Store badge