Français
Albanian
Arabic
Armenian
Azerbaijani
Belarusian
Bengali
Bosnian
Catalan
Czech
Danish
Deutsch
Dutch
English
Estonian
Finnish
Français
Greek
Haitian Creole
Hebrew
Hindi
Hungarian
Icelandic
Indonesian
Irish
Italian
Japanese
Korean
Latvian
Lithuanian
Macedonian
Mongolian
Norwegian
Persian
Polish
Portuguese
Romanian
Russian
Serbian
Slovak
Slovenian
Spanish
Swahili
Swedish
Turkish
Ukrainian
Vietnamese
Български
中文(简体)
中文(繁體)
International Journal of Cancer 1993-Dec

Differences in cell surface carbohydrates, and in laminin and fibronectin synthesis, between adherent and non-adherent Ehrlich ascites tumor cells.

Seuls les utilisateurs enregistrés peuvent traduire des articles
Se connecter S'inscrire
Le lien est enregistré dans le presse-papiers
Z Song
J Varani
I J Goldstein

Mots clés

Abstrait

Differences in cell surface carbohydrates and in laminin and fibronectin synthesis between 2 Ehrlich ascites tumor (EAT) cell lines, the adherent and non-adherent EAT cells, have been studied. The adherent EAT (a-EAT) cells grow in monolayer in vitro in the presence of fetal bovine serum. The classical, or non-adherent EAT (na-EAT), cells grow in suspension in ascites form in the peritoneal cavity of mice, and they do not adhere when cultured in vitro. Both EAT cell lines express surface glycoproteins reactive with Maackia amurensis lectin (MAL) and Griffonia simplicifolia isolectin GS I-B4. However, only a-EAT cells react with elderberry (Sambucus nigra) bark lectin (SNA), suggesting that there are some differences in the sialylation of cell surface carbohydrate moieties between these 2 EAT cell lines. Removal of cell surface sialic acid by treating a-EAT cells with Vibrio cholerae neuraminidase did not abolish the ability of these cells to adhere to laminin- or fibronectin-coated plates, indicating that the sialic acid of the cell surface glycoproteins is not essential for their adhesion to these extracellular matrices. Therefore, the difference in sialylation of cell surface glycoproteins is not responsible for the difference in cell adhesion between these 2 lines of EAT cells. Both EAT cell lines express detectable amounts of laminin but not fibronectin on their surfaces; they both secrete fibronectin and entactin into the medium. The na-EAT cells (but not the a-EAT cells) also secrete laminin A chain into the culture medium; however, no B chain was detected in the culture medium of either cell line. The laminin isolated from the cell surface of na-EAT cells reacts with GS I and MAL lectins, but not with SNA, whereas the laminin isolated from a-EAT cells reacts with SNA, as well as GS I and MAL.

Rejoignez notre
page facebook

La base de données d'herbes médicinales la plus complète soutenue par la science

  • Fonctionne en 55 langues
  • Cures à base de plantes soutenues par la science
  • Reconnaissance des herbes par image
  • Carte GPS interactive - étiquetez les herbes sur place (à venir)
  • Lisez les publications scientifiques liées à votre recherche
  • Rechercher les herbes médicinales par leurs effets
  • Organisez vos intérêts et restez à jour avec les nouvelles recherches, essais cliniques et brevets

Tapez un symptôme ou une maladie et lisez des informations sur les herbes qui pourraient aider, tapez une herbe et voyez les maladies et symptômes contre lesquels elle est utilisée.
* Toutes les informations sont basées sur des recherches scientifiques publiées

Google Play badgeApp Store badge