Français
Albanian
Arabic
Armenian
Azerbaijani
Belarusian
Bengali
Bosnian
Catalan
Czech
Danish
Deutsch
Dutch
English
Estonian
Finnish
Français
Greek
Haitian Creole
Hebrew
Hindi
Hungarian
Icelandic
Indonesian
Irish
Italian
Japanese
Korean
Latvian
Lithuanian
Macedonian
Mongolian
Norwegian
Persian
Polish
Portuguese
Romanian
Russian
Serbian
Slovak
Slovenian
Spanish
Swahili
Swedish
Turkish
Ukrainian
Vietnamese
Български
中文(简体)
中文(繁體)
Chinese Journal of Oncology 2012-Jun

[Docetaxel plus carboplatin versus EC-T as adjuvant chemotherapy for triple-negative breast cancer: safety data from a phase III randomized open-label trial].

Seuls les utilisateurs enregistrés peuvent traduire des articles
Se connecter S'inscrire
Le lien est enregistré dans le presse-papiers
Peng Yuan
Bing-he Xu
Jia-yu Wang
Fei Ma
Qing Li
Pin Zhang
Ying Fan
Qiao Li
Wen-miao Wang

Mots clés

Abstrait

OBJECTIVE

Triple-negative [estrogen receptor (ER)-/progesterone receptor (PR)-/HER2-] breast cancer (TNBC) accounts for ∼ 15% of overall breast cancer and associated with a poor prognosis. There is a short of standard adjuvant chemotherapy regimens for TNBC. A number of studies have shown that TNBC might be sensitive to cisplatin and carboplatin on the basis that dysfunction of BRCA1 and its pathway is associated with a specific DNA-repair defect, but data of adjuvant setting about this is limited.

METHODS

From January 2010 to September 2011, 95 early triple-negative breast cancer patients confirmed by pathology were randomly assigned to receive TP (docetaxel 75 mg/m², carboplatin AUC = 5, day 1, 21 days a cycle for 6 cycles) or EC-T (epirubicin 90 mg/m², cyclophosphamide 600 mg/m², d1, 21 days a cycle for 4 cycles, followed by docetaxel 80 mg/m², d1, 21 days a cycle for 4 cycles) chemotherapy. Adjuvant radiation therapy was given selectively after chemotherapy. Here we report a preliminary safety analysis with the chi-square test.

RESULTS

Seventy-six out of the 95 patients had completed the chemotherapy and could be assessed for the safety profiles of the regimens. Thirty-seven of them were in the EC-T group with a median age of 47 years, and 21 out of these 37 patients were premenopausal (56.8%). Another 39 patients came from the TP group with a median age of 46 years, and 22 out of these 39 patients were premenopausal (56.4%). All of the 37 patients in EC-T group completed the planned treatment whereas 2 patients of the 39 cases in TP group did not because of bone marrow suppression. During the treatments, 9 patients had dose adjustment in each group. Adverse events of grade 1/2 were common. Specific incidence of adverse events with grade 3/4 in each group was as follows: alopecia, 29.7% vs. 10.3% (P = 0.033), vomiting 21.6% vs. 7.7% (P = 0.085), leukopenia 54.1% vs.25.6% (P = 0.011) and neutropenia 51.4% vs. 35.9% (P = 0.174). Other grade 3/4 toxicities were rare. All the adverse events (except peripheral neuropathy and pigmentation) recovered within 1 month after the chemotherapy.

CONCLUSIONS

Both EC-T and TP regimens as adjuvant chemotherapy are safe and tolerable for the treatment of triple-negative breast cancer patients, while the TP regimen has advantages with less grade III/IV alopecia and leukopenia.

Rejoignez notre
page facebook

La base de données d'herbes médicinales la plus complète soutenue par la science

  • Fonctionne en 55 langues
  • Cures à base de plantes soutenues par la science
  • Reconnaissance des herbes par image
  • Carte GPS interactive - étiquetez les herbes sur place (à venir)
  • Lisez les publications scientifiques liées à votre recherche
  • Rechercher les herbes médicinales par leurs effets
  • Organisez vos intérêts et restez à jour avec les nouvelles recherches, essais cliniques et brevets

Tapez un symptôme ou une maladie et lisez des informations sur les herbes qui pourraient aider, tapez une herbe et voyez les maladies et symptômes contre lesquels elle est utilisée.
* Toutes les informations sont basées sur des recherches scientifiques publiées

Google Play badgeApp Store badge