Français
Albanian
Arabic
Armenian
Azerbaijani
Belarusian
Bengali
Bosnian
Catalan
Czech
Danish
Deutsch
Dutch
English
Estonian
Finnish
Français
Greek
Haitian Creole
Hebrew
Hindi
Hungarian
Icelandic
Indonesian
Irish
Italian
Japanese
Korean
Latvian
Lithuanian
Macedonian
Mongolian
Norwegian
Persian
Polish
Portuguese
Romanian
Russian
Serbian
Slovak
Slovenian
Spanish
Swahili
Swedish
Turkish
Ukrainian
Vietnamese
Български
中文(简体)
中文(繁體)
Sexually Transmitted Diseases 2019-Jan

Efficacy and safety of single dose oral delafloxacin compared with intramuscular ceftriaxone for uncomplicated gonorrhea treatment: an open-label, non-inferiority, Phase 3, multicenter, randomized study.

Seuls les utilisateurs enregistrés peuvent traduire des articles
Se connecter S'inscrire
Le lien est enregistré dans le presse-papiers
Edward Hook
Matthew Golden
Stephanie Taylor
Eugenia Henry
Carol Tseng
Jerri Swerdlow
Ashley Nenninger
Sue Cammarata

Mots clés

Abstrait

We evaluated single oral dose delafloxacin versus single intramuscular (IM) ceftriaxone in participants with uncomplicated urogenital gonorrhea (primary objective). Secondary objectives included the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of delafloxacin versus ceftriaxone for uncomplicated urogenital, rectal, and/or pharyngeal gonorrhea.In this open-label, multicenter study, 460 participants at 25 study centers were randomized (2:1) to receive a single 900mg oral dose of delafloxacin or 250mg IM ceftriaxone. N. gonorrhoeae culture, nucleic acid amplification test (NAAT) and clinical responses were evaluated. The primary efficacy endpoint was the urogenital microbiological cure in the urogenital microbiological intention-to-treat (UMITT) population; non-inferiority (NI) was assessed using a 10% NI margin.In the UMITT population, urogenital cure rates for delafloxacin were 85.1% (194/228) vs 91.0% (91/100) for ceftriaxone [95% CI -13.18% to 1.36%]. As the lower bound of the CI exceeded the pre-specified -10% NI margin, delafloxacin did not demonstrate non-inferiority to ceftriaxone. Treatment failures were more often associated with N. gonorrhoeae with higher delafloxacin minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) values. In microbiologically evaluable participants, failure occurred in 1 of 177 (0.6%) urogenital infections caused by isolates with delafloxacin MICs <0.008 μg/mL, and 31 of 48 (64.6%) infections caused by isolates with delafloxacin MICs >0.008 μg/mL. Gastrointestinal adverse events (AEs) were common with 900mg of delafloxacin, and typically included mild to moderate diarrhea, flatulence, nausea, and vomiting. The most common AE was diarrhea in both treatment groups.A single 900mg dose of delafloxacin is not a reliable treatment for uncomplicated urogenital gonorrhea. Treatment failures were common in infections caused by N. gonorrhoeae with delafloxacin MICs >0.008 μg/mL. Additional testing with alternative dosing regimens could be considered.ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02015637.

Rejoignez notre
page facebook

La base de données d'herbes médicinales la plus complète soutenue par la science

  • Fonctionne en 55 langues
  • Cures à base de plantes soutenues par la science
  • Reconnaissance des herbes par image
  • Carte GPS interactive - étiquetez les herbes sur place (à venir)
  • Lisez les publications scientifiques liées à votre recherche
  • Rechercher les herbes médicinales par leurs effets
  • Organisez vos intérêts et restez à jour avec les nouvelles recherches, essais cliniques et brevets

Tapez un symptôme ou une maladie et lisez des informations sur les herbes qui pourraient aider, tapez une herbe et voyez les maladies et symptômes contre lesquels elle est utilisée.
* Toutes les informations sont basées sur des recherches scientifiques publiées

Google Play badgeApp Store badge