Français
Albanian
Arabic
Armenian
Azerbaijani
Belarusian
Bengali
Bosnian
Catalan
Czech
Danish
Deutsch
Dutch
English
Estonian
Finnish
Français
Greek
Haitian Creole
Hebrew
Hindi
Hungarian
Icelandic
Indonesian
Irish
Italian
Japanese
Korean
Latvian
Lithuanian
Macedonian
Mongolian
Norwegian
Persian
Polish
Portuguese
Romanian
Russian
Serbian
Slovak
Slovenian
Spanish
Swahili
Swedish
Turkish
Ukrainian
Vietnamese
Български
中文(简体)
中文(繁體)
Plant Disease 2010-Aug

First Report of Agrobacterium rubi and A. rhizogenes Causing Crown and Root Gall and Hairy Root on Blueberry in Argentina.

Seuls les utilisateurs enregistrés peuvent traduire des articles
Se connecter S'inscrire
Le lien est enregistré dans le presse-papiers
A Alippi
A Lopez
P Balatti

Mots clés

Abstrait

From 2006 to 2009, crown gall and hairy root symptoms were observed on blueberry (Vaccinium corymbosum cvs. O'Neil, Millennia, and Misty) plants from six nurseries in Tucumán, Concordia, Pilar, Morón, and Baradero, Argentina. Bacteria were isolated from galls of all three cultivars and from hairy roots of Millenia and O'Neil onto D1 and D1M agar media at 27°C. Typical Agrobacterium colonies developed in 5 days (2). Seven bacterial strains (five from galls and two from hairy roots) were studied further. All were gram negative, aerobic, and catalase positive with rod-shaped cells that synthesized β-galactosidase and metabolized D-glucose, D-arabinose, n-acetyl-glucosamine, maltose, mannitol, and malonate. Strains were negative for lysine decarboxylase, H2S production, indole, and 3-ketolactose production. While gall strains were urease positive and citrate variable (mostly positive), hairy root strains were urease negative, citrate positive, had poly-β-hydroxybutyrate inclusion granules, and clarified acid on potato dextrose agar containing 0.5% CaCO3 (2). Agrobacterium tumefaciens ATCC 15955 and LBA 958 were included as controls. PCR with virA/C primers amplified a 338-bp product corresponding to the virD2 operon and confirmed that the strains harbored a pathogenic plasmid (1). Bacterial strains were assigned to biovars with a multiplex PCR assay targeting 23S rRNA sequences (3). Two strains produced PCR amplicons typical of A. rhizogenes bv. 2. The other five strains produced PCR amplicons typical of A. rubi, which were insensitive to agrocin in a bioassay with A. radiobacter strain K1026. Identity was confirmed by sequencing the 16S rDNA of strains F 266 (GenBank No. GU580894) and F 289 (No. GU580895), which had 99% homology to 16sRNA sequences of A. rubi ICMP 11833 (AY626395.1) and A. rhizogenes ATCC 11325 (AY945955.1), respectively. Pathogenicity of all seven strains was tested on V. corymbosum cv. Misty, Bryophyllum daigremontiana, tobacco cv. Xanthi, tomato cv. Presto, and pepper cv. California Wonder. Plants were inoculated by a needle stabbed into the stems with the appropriate cell suspension (108 CFU/ml) of each strain or with sterile distilled water (control treatment). Two plants of each species were tested per strain. Plants were grown for at least 45 days at 23 ± 3°C and symptoms were recorded. Inoculations with the five strains isolated from galls caused development of spherical, white to flesh-colored, rough, spongy wart-like galls at the inoculation sites. Root strains induced root proliferation on all inoculated plants as well as in a carrot disk bioassay (4). On blueberry plants, galls were dark brown to black, rough, and woody 6 months after inoculation. No lesions were observed on control plants. Bacteria were reisolated from symptomatic tissues of inoculated plants. Enterobacterial repetitive intergeneric consensus-PCR confirmed that the DNA fingerprints of the reisolated strains were identical to those of the original strains. To our knowledge, this is the first report of A. rubi and A. rhizogenes causing hairy root and crown gall on blueberry in Argentina. References: (1) J. H. Haas et. al. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 61:2879,1995. (2) L. W. Moore et al. Page 17 in: Laboratory Guide for Identification of Plant Pathogenic Bacteria. 3rd ed. N. W. Schaad et al., eds. The American Phytopathological Society, St. Paul, MN, 2001. (3) J. Pulawska et al. Syst. Appl. Microbiol. 29:470, 2006. (4) M. H. Ryder et al. Plant Physiol. 77:215, 1985.

Rejoignez notre
page facebook

La base de données d'herbes médicinales la plus complète soutenue par la science

  • Fonctionne en 55 langues
  • Cures à base de plantes soutenues par la science
  • Reconnaissance des herbes par image
  • Carte GPS interactive - étiquetez les herbes sur place (à venir)
  • Lisez les publications scientifiques liées à votre recherche
  • Rechercher les herbes médicinales par leurs effets
  • Organisez vos intérêts et restez à jour avec les nouvelles recherches, essais cliniques et brevets

Tapez un symptôme ou une maladie et lisez des informations sur les herbes qui pourraient aider, tapez une herbe et voyez les maladies et symptômes contre lesquels elle est utilisée.
* Toutes les informations sont basées sur des recherches scientifiques publiées

Google Play badgeApp Store badge