Français
Albanian
Arabic
Armenian
Azerbaijani
Belarusian
Bengali
Bosnian
Catalan
Czech
Danish
Deutsch
Dutch
English
Estonian
Finnish
Français
Greek
Haitian Creole
Hebrew
Hindi
Hungarian
Icelandic
Indonesian
Irish
Italian
Japanese
Korean
Latvian
Lithuanian
Macedonian
Mongolian
Norwegian
Persian
Polish
Portuguese
Romanian
Russian
Serbian
Slovak
Slovenian
Spanish
Swahili
Swedish
Turkish
Ukrainian
Vietnamese
Български
中文(简体)
中文(繁體)
International Journal of Cancer 1986-Nov

Formaldehyde and cancers of the pharynx, sinus and nasal cavity: I. Occupational exposures.

Seuls les utilisateurs enregistrés peuvent traduire des articles
Se connecter S'inscrire
Le lien est enregistré dans le presse-papiers
T L Vaughan
C Strader
S Davis
J R Daling

Mots clés

Abstrait

A population-based case-control study was undertaken in 13 counties of western Washington to determine if occupational formaldehyde exposure was related to cancer of the oro- and hypopharynx (OHPC, N = 205), nasopharynx (NPC, N = 27) or sinus and nasal cavity (SNC, N = 53). Controls were selected by random digit dialing (N = 552). A telephone interview inquired about lifetime occupational history as well as a number of potential confounding factors, including smoking and drinking. Approximately half (N = 143) of the case interviews were with next-of-kin. Occupational formaldehyde exposures were assessed by application of job-exposure matrix developed for this study which classified unique job codes into 4 categories based on judgement of likelihood and intensity of formaldehyde exposure. Exposure scores were calculated by weighing the number of years in a formaldehyde-associated job by the assigned exposure level. The effects assuming a 15-year induction period were also investigated. Logistic regression was used to estimate exposure odds ratios (OR) while taking into account multiple risk factors for each site. No significant associations were found between occupational formaldehyde exposure and any of the cancer sites under study. However, relative risk estimates associated with the highest exposure score categories were elevated for OHPC (OR = 1.3, 95% Confidence Interval = 0.6-3.1) and NPC (OR = 2.1, 95% CI = 0.4-10.0) when an induction period was accounted for. When only live interviews were considered, the odds ratios for OHPC and NPC increased to 1.7 and 3.1 respectively. Several limitations in the study tend to conservatively bias the results and must be taken into account in its interpretation.

Rejoignez notre
page facebook

La base de données d'herbes médicinales la plus complète soutenue par la science

  • Fonctionne en 55 langues
  • Cures à base de plantes soutenues par la science
  • Reconnaissance des herbes par image
  • Carte GPS interactive - étiquetez les herbes sur place (à venir)
  • Lisez les publications scientifiques liées à votre recherche
  • Rechercher les herbes médicinales par leurs effets
  • Organisez vos intérêts et restez à jour avec les nouvelles recherches, essais cliniques et brevets

Tapez un symptôme ou une maladie et lisez des informations sur les herbes qui pourraient aider, tapez une herbe et voyez les maladies et symptômes contre lesquels elle est utilisée.
* Toutes les informations sont basées sur des recherches scientifiques publiées

Google Play badgeApp Store badge