Physiological versus standard sex steroid replacement in young women with premature ovarian failure: effects on bone mass acquisition and turnover.
Mots clés
Abstrait
BACKGROUND
The aim of this exploratory study was to establish whether we could improve skeletal health with a physiological regimen of SSR in young women with premature ovarian failure (POF).
METHODS
In an open-label randomized controlled crossover trial, 34 women with POF were randomized to 4-week cycles of pSSR (transdermal oestradiol, 100 μg daily for week 1, 150 μg for weeks 2-4; vaginal progesterone, 200 mg twice daily for weeks 3-4) or standard hormone replacement treatment (sHRT) (oral ethinyloestradiol 30 μg and 1·5 mg norethisterone daily for weeks 1-3, week 4 'pill-free') for 12 months. Bone mineral density (BMD) was measured by DEXA at study entry and after each 12-month treatment period. Blood samples for hormones and markers of bone formation (bone alkaline phosphatase, BALP and type I collagen N-terminal propeptide, PINP) and bone resorption (CrossLaps) were collected pre-/postwashout and after 3, 6 and 12 months of each treatment.
RESULTS
Eighteen women, mean 27 (range 19-39) years, completed the study. Both regimens caused similar suppression of LH and FSH. Mean baseline lumbar spine BMD z-score was -0·89 (95% CI -1·27 to -0·51) and increased by +0·17 (CI +0·07 to +0·27) in response to pSSR (P = 0·003), compared with +0·07 (CI -0·03 to +0·18) during standard HRT (P = 0·2). During pSSR, the increment in lumbar spine BMD z-score was related positively to oestradiol (r = +0·49, P = 0·04) and inversely to FSH (r = -0·65, P = 0·004). Bone formation markers, BALP and P1NP increased in the pSSR arm (anova P < 0·001) but decreased in the sHRT arm (P < 0·01). Both treatments suppressed the bone resorption marker, CrossLaps (P < 0·001).
CONCLUSIONS
We conclude that pSSR over 12 months has a beneficial affect on bone mass acquisition on the lumbar spine in women with POF, mediated by increased bone formation and decreased bone resorption.
