Irish
Albanian
Arabic
Armenian
Azerbaijani
Belarusian
Bengali
Bosnian
Catalan
Czech
Danish
Deutsch
Dutch
English
Estonian
Finnish
Français
Greek
Haitian Creole
Hebrew
Hindi
Hungarian
Icelandic
Indonesian
Irish
Italian
Japanese
Korean
Latvian
Lithuanian
Macedonian
Mongolian
Norwegian
Persian
Polish
Portuguese
Romanian
Russian
Serbian
Slovak
Slovenian
Spanish
Swahili
Swedish
Turkish
Ukrainian
Vietnamese
Български
中文(简体)
中文(繁體)
Life Sciences 2015-Jun

Chondroprotective effects of a new glucosamine combination in rats: Gene expression, biochemical and histopathological evaluation.

Ní féidir ach le húsáideoirí cláraithe ailt a aistriú
Logáil Isteach / Cláraigh
Sábháiltear an nasc chuig an gearrthaisce
Yilmaz Ucuncu
Nuray Celik
Cengiz Ozturk
Murat Turkoglu
Nihal Cetin
Nizamettin Kockara
Ebru Sener
Cihat Dundar
Aynur Arslan
Hasan Dogan

Keywords

Coimriú

OBJECTIVE

This study investigates the effect of a new combination of glucosamine hydrochloride, chondroitin sulfate, methylsulfonylmethane, Harpagophytum procumbens root extract (standardized to 3% harpagoside) and bromelain extract (GCMHB) on formalin-induced damage to cartilage tissue in the rat knee joint and evaluates this combination in comparison with another combination of glucosamine hydrochloride, chondroitin sulfate and methylsulfonylmethane (GKM).

METHODS

Animals in the control group were injected with formalin into the knee joint (FCG). Animals in the GCMHB-500 group were given 500mg/kg GCMHB+formalin, and those in the GKM-500 group were given 500mg/kg GKM+formalin. Finally, a healthy group (HG) was also used. GCMHB and GKM were administered to rats orally once a day for 30days. At the end of this period, the rats were sacrificed and the levels of MDA, NO, 8-OH/Gua, and tGSH in the knee joint tissue were measured. Analysis of IL-1β and TNF-α gene expression was done and the tissue was evaluated histopathologically.

RESULTS

MDA, NO and 8-OH/Gua levels and IL-1β and TNF-α gene expression were significantly lower in the GCMHB-500 group compared to the FCG group, whereas tGSH was significantly higher in the GCMHB-500 group than in the FCG group. No significant difference was found for the IL-1β, TNF-α and oxidant/antioxidant parameters between the GKM and FCG groups. The histopathological analysis showed that GCMHB could prevent damage to the cartilage joint, whereas GKM could not.

CONCLUSIONS

GCMHB may be used clinically by comparing with GKM in the treatment of osteoarthritis.

Bí ar ár
leathanach facebook

An bunachar luibheanna míochaine is iomláine le tacaíocht ón eolaíocht

  • Oibreacha i 55 teanga
  • Leigheasanna luibhe le tacaíocht ón eolaíocht
  • Aitheantas luibheanna de réir íomhá
  • Léarscáil GPS idirghníomhach - clibeáil luibheanna ar an láthair (ag teacht go luath)
  • Léigh foilseacháin eolaíochta a bhaineann le do chuardach
  • Cuardaigh luibheanna míochaine de réir a n-éifeachtaí
  • Eagraigh do chuid spéiseanna agus fanacht suas chun dáta leis an taighde nuachta, trialacha cliniciúla agus paitinní

Clóscríobh symptom nó galar agus léigh faoi luibheanna a d’fhéadfadh cabhrú, luibh a chlóscríobh agus galair agus comharthaí a úsáidtear ina choinne a fheiceáil.
* Tá an fhaisnéis uile bunaithe ar thaighde eolaíoch foilsithe

Google Play badgeApp Store badge