Irish
Albanian
Arabic
Armenian
Azerbaijani
Belarusian
Bengali
Bosnian
Catalan
Czech
Danish
Deutsch
Dutch
English
Estonian
Finnish
Français
Greek
Haitian Creole
Hebrew
Hindi
Hungarian
Icelandic
Indonesian
Irish
Italian
Japanese
Korean
Latvian
Lithuanian
Macedonian
Mongolian
Norwegian
Persian
Polish
Portuguese
Romanian
Russian
Serbian
Slovak
Slovenian
Spanish
Swahili
Swedish
Turkish
Ukrainian
Vietnamese
Български
中文(简体)
中文(繁體)
Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 2018-Aug

From Robinia pseudoacacia L. nectar to Acacia monofloral honey: biochemical changes and variation of biological properties.

Ní féidir ach le húsáideoirí cláraithe ailt a aistriú
Logáil Isteach / Cláraigh
Sábháiltear an nasc chuig an gearrthaisce
Angelo Gismondi
Silvia De Rossi
Lorena Canuti
Silvia Novelli
Gabriele Di Marco
Laura Fattorini
Antonella Canini

Keywords

Coimriú

BACKGROUND

Robinia pseudoacacia L. nectar and its derivative monofloral honey were systematically compared in this study, to understand how much the starting solution reflected the final product, after re-elaboration by Apis mellifera ligustica Spinola.

RESULTS

Subjected to dehydration in the hive, nectar changed in its water and sugar content when transformed into honey, as physicochemical and gas chromatographic-mass spectrometric analyses revealed. Spectrophotometric measurements and characterization by high-performance liquid chromatography-diode array detection of 18 plant molecules demonstrated honey to be richer than nectar in secondary metabolites. For the first time, the hypothesis of the existence of a nectar redox cycle in R. pseudoacacia was reported, as previously described for Nicotiana sp., based on 1D-protein profiles, western blot analysis and detection of H2 O2 and ascorbate. The bioactivity of both matrices was also investigated. Antiradical in vitro tests showed that Acacia honey was more antioxidant than nectar, which was even able to induce oxidative stress directly in a eukaryotic cell system. Antimicrobial assays demonstrated that nectar was bacteriostatic, due to H2 O2 activity, whereas honey was even bactericidal.

CONCLUSIONS

All these data support the ecological role of nectar and honey in nature: protection of the gynoecium from pathogens and preservation from degradative processes, respectively. © 2018 Society of Chemical Industry.

Bí ar ár
leathanach facebook

An bunachar luibheanna míochaine is iomláine le tacaíocht ón eolaíocht

  • Oibreacha i 55 teanga
  • Leigheasanna luibhe le tacaíocht ón eolaíocht
  • Aitheantas luibheanna de réir íomhá
  • Léarscáil GPS idirghníomhach - clibeáil luibheanna ar an láthair (ag teacht go luath)
  • Léigh foilseacháin eolaíochta a bhaineann le do chuardach
  • Cuardaigh luibheanna míochaine de réir a n-éifeachtaí
  • Eagraigh do chuid spéiseanna agus fanacht suas chun dáta leis an taighde nuachta, trialacha cliniciúla agus paitinní

Clóscríobh symptom nó galar agus léigh faoi luibheanna a d’fhéadfadh cabhrú, luibh a chlóscríobh agus galair agus comharthaí a úsáidtear ina choinne a fheiceáil.
* Tá an fhaisnéis uile bunaithe ar thaighde eolaíoch foilsithe

Google Play badgeApp Store badge