Hindi
Albanian
Arabic
Armenian
Azerbaijani
Belarusian
Bengali
Bosnian
Catalan
Czech
Danish
Deutsch
Dutch
English
Estonian
Finnish
Français
Greek
Haitian Creole
Hebrew
Hindi
Hungarian
Icelandic
Indonesian
Irish
Italian
Japanese
Korean
Latvian
Lithuanian
Macedonian
Mongolian
Norwegian
Persian
Polish
Portuguese
Romanian
Russian
Serbian
Slovak
Slovenian
Spanish
Swahili
Swedish
Turkish
Ukrainian
Vietnamese
Български
中文(简体)
中文(繁體)
Clinical Nephrology 2006-Mar

Lanthanum carbonate versus standard therapy for the treatment of hyperphosphatemia: safety and efficacy in chronic maintenance hemodialysis patients.

केवल पंजीकृत उपयोगकर्ता ही लेखों का अनुवाद कर सकते हैं
साइन अप करने के लिए लॉग इन करें
लिंक क्लिपबोर्ड पर सहेजा गया है
W F Finn
SPD 405-307 Lanthanum Study Group

कीवर्ड

सार

OBJECTIVE

No conventional phosphate binder is entirely satisfactory for the treatment of hyperphosphatemia in patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD). Consequently, there is a need for new agents. One such agent is lanthanum carbonate (La). This large-scale study compares the safety of La with standard therapy (any approved phosphate binder) in patients who were treated for up to 2 years. Efficacy, having previously been demonstrated, was a secondary endpoint.

METHODS

After washout, patients were randomized to receive La (n=682) or their pre-study phosphate binder (n=677). Over a 6-week period, La was titrated to a maximum daily dose of 3000 mg elemental lanthanum (serum phosphorus target levels for titration were < or = 5.9 mg/dl (1.90 mmol/l)). Safety assessments included adverse events (AEs), full laboratory parameters and blood profiles. Efficacy assessments included serum phosphorus, calcium, calcium x phosphorus product and parathyroid hormone (PTH) levels.

RESULTS

Average treatment exposure was greater in the standard therapy group (501.4 days) than in the La group (370.3 days) because standard therapy patients who switched or combined treatments were allowed to continue in the study. The most common AEs were gastrointestinal. The incidences of AEs in the La and treatment exposure-corrected standard therapy groups were nausea, 37 versus 29%; vomiting, 27 versus 22% and diarrhea (24% in each group). Hypercalcemia that was reported as an AE (La versus treatment exposure-corrected standard therapy) occurred in 4.3% and 8.4% of patients, respectively. There was no indication of liver toxicity, suppression of erythropoiesis or changes in the mini-mental state examination. Over 2 years, phosphorus control was similar in both groups; in the La group, however, serum calcium was lower and serum PTH levels were maintained in the range recommended by the National Kidney Foundation Kidney Disease Outcomes Quality Initiative (K/DOQI).

CONCLUSIONS

The 2-year tolerability and efficacy of La are similar to those seen with standard therapy, although lower serum calcium levels and improved PTH levels were observed in the La group. These results support La as a viable new option for the management of hyperphosphatemia in ESRD.

हमारे फेसबुक पेज से जुड़ें

विज्ञान द्वारा समर्थित सबसे पूर्ण औषधीय जड़ी बूटी डेटाबेस

  • 55 भाषाओं में काम करता है
  • विज्ञान द्वारा समर्थित हर्बल इलाज
  • छवि द्वारा जड़ी बूटी की मान्यता
  • इंटरएक्टिव जीपीएस नक्शा - स्थान पर टैग जड़ी बूटियों (जल्द ही आ रहा है)
  • अपनी खोज से संबंधित वैज्ञानिक प्रकाशन पढ़ें
  • उनके प्रभाव से औषधीय जड़ी बूटियों की खोज करें
  • अपने हितों को व्यवस्थित करें और समाचार अनुसंधान, नैदानिक परीक्षणों और पेटेंट के साथ अद्यतित रहें

एक लक्षण या बीमारी टाइप करें और जड़ी-बूटियों के बारे में पढ़ें जो मदद कर सकती हैं, एक जड़ी बूटी टाइप करें और बीमारियों और लक्षणों को देखें जिनके खिलाफ इसका उपयोग किया जाता है।
* सभी जानकारी प्रकाशित वैज्ञानिक शोध पर आधारित है

Google Play badgeApp Store badge