Hindi
Albanian
Arabic
Armenian
Azerbaijani
Belarusian
Bengali
Bosnian
Catalan
Czech
Danish
Deutsch
Dutch
English
Estonian
Finnish
Français
Greek
Haitian Creole
Hebrew
Hindi
Hungarian
Icelandic
Indonesian
Irish
Italian
Japanese
Korean
Latvian
Lithuanian
Macedonian
Mongolian
Norwegian
Persian
Polish
Portuguese
Romanian
Russian
Serbian
Slovak
Slovenian
Spanish
Swahili
Swedish
Turkish
Ukrainian
Vietnamese
Български
中文(简体)
中文(繁體)
American Journal of Surgery 2013-Feb

Laparoscopic umbilical hernia repair is the preferred approach in obese patients.

केवल पंजीकृत उपयोगकर्ता ही लेखों का अनुवाद कर सकते हैं
साइन अप करने के लिए लॉग इन करें
लिंक क्लिपबोर्ड पर सहेजा गया है
Modesto J Colon
Riley Kitamura
Dana A Telem
Scott Nguyen
Celia M Divino

कीवर्ड

सार

BACKGROUND

The optimal method of umbilical hernia repair (UHR) in the obese population, laparoscopic vs open, is not standardized. The purpose of this study was to determine the optimal surgical option for UHR in the obese population.

METHODS

A retrospective chart review was conducted on 123 obese patients (body mass index [BMI] >30) who underwent UHR from 2003 to 2009 at a single institution. Patients were grouped by surgical approach (open vs laparoscopic). Intraoperative and postoperative courses were compared. Follow-up in the postoperative period was obtained from patient records and telephone interviews.

RESULTS

Of the 123 patients undergoing UHR, 40 and 83 patients were operated on with the laparoscopic and open approach, respectively. Patients were well matched by demographics as well as comorbidities. No difference in the mean BMI was shown between the laparoscopic and open groups (37 vs 35, P = not significant, respectively). The operative time was significantly prolonged in the laparoscopic group (106 vs 71 minutes, P < .01). Intraoperatively, no complications occurred in either group. In the immediate postoperative period, 1 patient who underwent laparoscopic UHR was readmitted for small bowel obstruction, and 2 patients in the open group were readmitted, 1 for pain control and 1 for wound infection. Follow-up was achieved in 63% of the laparoscopic group and 58% of the open group with a mean follow-up of 15 months in the laparoscopic group and 20 months in the open group (P = not significant). A significant increase in wound infection was reported in the open group with mesh insertion when compared with the laparoscopic procedure (26% vs 4%, P < .05, respectively). No hernia recurrence was shown in the laparoscopic vs the open group with mesh insertion (0% vs 4%, P = not significant, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

In obese patients, the laparoscopic approach was associated with a significantly lower rate of postoperative infection and no hernia recurrence. Laparoscopic hernia repair may be the preferred option in the obese patient.

हमारे फेसबुक पेज से जुड़ें

विज्ञान द्वारा समर्थित सबसे पूर्ण औषधीय जड़ी बूटी डेटाबेस

  • 55 भाषाओं में काम करता है
  • विज्ञान द्वारा समर्थित हर्बल इलाज
  • छवि द्वारा जड़ी बूटी की मान्यता
  • इंटरएक्टिव जीपीएस नक्शा - स्थान पर टैग जड़ी बूटियों (जल्द ही आ रहा है)
  • अपनी खोज से संबंधित वैज्ञानिक प्रकाशन पढ़ें
  • उनके प्रभाव से औषधीय जड़ी बूटियों की खोज करें
  • अपने हितों को व्यवस्थित करें और समाचार अनुसंधान, नैदानिक परीक्षणों और पेटेंट के साथ अद्यतित रहें

एक लक्षण या बीमारी टाइप करें और जड़ी-बूटियों के बारे में पढ़ें जो मदद कर सकती हैं, एक जड़ी बूटी टाइप करें और बीमारियों और लक्षणों को देखें जिनके खिलाफ इसका उपयोग किया जाता है।
* सभी जानकारी प्रकाशित वैज्ञानिक शोध पर आधारित है

Google Play badgeApp Store badge