Hindi
Albanian
Arabic
Armenian
Azerbaijani
Belarusian
Bengali
Bosnian
Catalan
Czech
Danish
Deutsch
Dutch
English
Estonian
Finnish
Français
Greek
Haitian Creole
Hebrew
Hindi
Hungarian
Icelandic
Indonesian
Irish
Italian
Japanese
Korean
Latvian
Lithuanian
Macedonian
Mongolian
Norwegian
Persian
Polish
Portuguese
Romanian
Russian
Serbian
Slovak
Slovenian
Spanish
Swahili
Swedish
Turkish
Ukrainian
Vietnamese
Български
中文(简体)
中文(繁體)
Molecular and Clinical Oncology 2016-Sep

Neutropenia as a prognostic factor and safety of second-line therapy with S-1 for advanced or recurrent pancreatic cancer.

केवल पंजीकृत उपयोगकर्ता ही लेखों का अनुवाद कर सकते हैं
साइन अप करने के लिए लॉग इन करें
लिंक क्लिपबोर्ड पर सहेजा गया है
Makiko Ikagawa
Michio Kimura
Mina Iwai
Eiseki Usami
Tomoaki Yoshimura
Kimio Yasuda

कीवर्ड

सार

The aim of this retrospective study was to investigate the safety of S-1 as second-line therapy and to evaluate the association between neutropenia occurring during first-line gemcitabine (GEM) therapy and survival for advanced or recurrent pancreatic cancer (APC). Between January, 2010 and December, 2014, 123 APC patients received chemotherapy at the Ogaki Municipal Hospital (Ogaki, Japan). Of those, 37 received GEM as first-line and S-1 as a second-line therapy (GEM→S-1 group). A further 60 patients received GEM as first-line therapy, but did not receive second-line therapy (GEM group). The median overall survival in the GEM→S-1 (n=37) and GEM (n=60) groups was 323 days [95% confidence interval (CI): 138-218.9 days] and 172 days (95% CI: 105-184.4 days), respectively (P=0.0004). The median overall survival in the mild (grade ≤2; n=63) and severe (grade ≥3; n=34) neutropenia groups was 178 days (95% CI: 182-275 days) and 330 days (95% CI: 297-514 days), respectively (log-rank test, P=0.0023). The severe non-haematological toxicities associated with S-1 as second-line therapy were nausea (2.7%) and hand-foot syndrome (2.7%). Second-line S-1 treatment was discontinued due to adverse events in 5.4% (2/37) of the cases. In conclusion, neutropenia occurring during GEM therapy administered as first-line treatment to APC patients was strongly associated with a better prognosis. S-1 therapy as second-line treatment was associated with a low incidence of severe adverse events and the patients were able to successfully continue treatment.

हमारे फेसबुक पेज से जुड़ें

विज्ञान द्वारा समर्थित सबसे पूर्ण औषधीय जड़ी बूटी डेटाबेस

  • 55 भाषाओं में काम करता है
  • विज्ञान द्वारा समर्थित हर्बल इलाज
  • छवि द्वारा जड़ी बूटी की मान्यता
  • इंटरएक्टिव जीपीएस नक्शा - स्थान पर टैग जड़ी बूटियों (जल्द ही आ रहा है)
  • अपनी खोज से संबंधित वैज्ञानिक प्रकाशन पढ़ें
  • उनके प्रभाव से औषधीय जड़ी बूटियों की खोज करें
  • अपने हितों को व्यवस्थित करें और समाचार अनुसंधान, नैदानिक परीक्षणों और पेटेंट के साथ अद्यतित रहें

एक लक्षण या बीमारी टाइप करें और जड़ी-बूटियों के बारे में पढ़ें जो मदद कर सकती हैं, एक जड़ी बूटी टाइप करें और बीमारियों और लक्षणों को देखें जिनके खिलाफ इसका उपयोग किया जाता है।
* सभी जानकारी प्रकाशित वैज्ञानिक शोध पर आधारित है

Google Play badgeApp Store badge