Hindi
Albanian
Arabic
Armenian
Azerbaijani
Belarusian
Bengali
Bosnian
Catalan
Czech
Danish
Deutsch
Dutch
English
Estonian
Finnish
Français
Greek
Haitian Creole
Hebrew
Hindi
Hungarian
Icelandic
Indonesian
Irish
Italian
Japanese
Korean
Latvian
Lithuanian
Macedonian
Mongolian
Norwegian
Persian
Polish
Portuguese
Romanian
Russian
Serbian
Slovak
Slovenian
Spanish
Swahili
Swedish
Turkish
Ukrainian
Vietnamese
Български
中文(简体)
中文(繁體)
PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases 2020-Jun

Safety and efficacy of co-administered diethylcarbamazine, albendazole and ivermectin during mass drug administration for lymphatic filariasis in Haiti: Results from a two-armed, open-label, cluster-randomized, community study

केवल पंजीकृत उपयोगकर्ता ही लेखों का अनुवाद कर सकते हैं
साइन अप करने के लिए लॉग इन करें
लिंक क्लिपबोर्ड पर सहेजा गया है
Christine Dubray
Anita Sircar
Valery de Rochars
Joshua Bogus
Abdel Direny
Jean Ernest
Carl Fayette
Charles Goss
Marisa Hast
Kobie O'Brian

कीवर्ड

सार

In Haiti, 22 communes still require mass drug administration (MDA) to eliminate lymphatic filariasis (LF) as a public health problem. Several clinical trials have shown that a single oral dose of ivermectin (IVM), diethylcarbamazine (DEC) and albendazole (ALB) (IDA) is more effective than DEC plus ALB (DA) for clearing Wuchereria bancrofti microfilariae (Mf). We performed a cluster-randomized community study to compare the safety and efficacy of IDA and DA in an LF-endemic area in northern Haiti. Ten localities were randomized to receive either DA or IDA. Participants were monitored for adverse events (AE), parasite antigenemia, and microfilaremia. Antigen-positive participants were retested one year after MDA to assess treatment efficacy. Fewer participants (11.0%, 321/2917) experienced at least one AE after IDA compared to DA (17.3%, 491/2844, P<0.001). Most AEs were mild, and the three most common AEs reported were headaches, dizziness and abdominal pain. Serious AEs developed in three participants who received DA. Baseline prevalence for filarial antigenemia was 8.0% (239/3004) in IDA localities and 11.5% (344/2994) in DA localities (<0.001). Of those with positive antigenemia, 17.6% (42/239) in IDA localities and 20.9% (72/344, P = 0.25) in DA localities were microfilaremic. One year after treatment, 84% percent of persons with positive filarial antigen tests at baseline could be retested. Clearance rates for filarial antigenemia were 20.5% (41/200) after IDA versus 25.4% (74/289) after DA (P = 0.3). However, 94.4% (34/36) of IDA recipients and 75.9% (44/58) of DA recipients with baseline microfilaremia were Mf negative at the time of retest (P = 0.02). Thus, MDA with IDA was at least as well tolerated and significantly more effective for clearing Mf compared to the standard DA regimen in this study. Effective MDA coverage with IDA could accelerate the elimination of LF as a public health problem in the 22 communes that still require MDA in Haiti.

हमारे फेसबुक पेज से जुड़ें

विज्ञान द्वारा समर्थित सबसे पूर्ण औषधीय जड़ी बूटी डेटाबेस

  • 55 भाषाओं में काम करता है
  • विज्ञान द्वारा समर्थित हर्बल इलाज
  • छवि द्वारा जड़ी बूटी की मान्यता
  • इंटरएक्टिव जीपीएस नक्शा - स्थान पर टैग जड़ी बूटियों (जल्द ही आ रहा है)
  • अपनी खोज से संबंधित वैज्ञानिक प्रकाशन पढ़ें
  • उनके प्रभाव से औषधीय जड़ी बूटियों की खोज करें
  • अपने हितों को व्यवस्थित करें और समाचार अनुसंधान, नैदानिक परीक्षणों और पेटेंट के साथ अद्यतित रहें

एक लक्षण या बीमारी टाइप करें और जड़ी-बूटियों के बारे में पढ़ें जो मदद कर सकती हैं, एक जड़ी बूटी टाइप करें और बीमारियों और लक्षणों को देखें जिनके खिलाफ इसका उपयोग किया जाता है।
* सभी जानकारी प्रकाशित वैज्ञानिक शोध पर आधारित है

Google Play badgeApp Store badge