Albanian
Arabic
Armenian
Azerbaijani
Belarusian
Bengali
Bosnian
Catalan
Czech
Danish
Deutsch
Dutch
English
Estonian
Finnish
Français
Greek
Haitian Creole
Hebrew
Hindi
Hungarian
Icelandic
Indonesian
Irish
Italian
Japanese
Korean
Latvian
Lithuanian
Macedonian
Mongolian
Norwegian
Persian
Polish
Portuguese
Romanian
Russian
Serbian
Slovak
Slovenian
Spanish
Swahili
Swedish
Turkish
Ukrainian
Vietnamese
Български
中文(简体)
中文(繁體)
Journal of the American College of Cardiology 2018-Jul

Epinephrine Versus Norepinephrine for Cardiogenic Shock After Acute Myocardial Infarction.

Samo registrirani korisnici mogu prevoditi članke
Prijava Registriraj se
Veza se sprema u međuspremnik
Bruno Levy
Raphael Clere-Jehl
Annick Legras
Tristan Morichau-Beauchant
Marc Leone
Ganster Frederique
Jean-Pierre Quenot
Antoine Kimmoun
Alain Cariou
Johan Lassus

Ključne riječi

Sažetak

BACKGROUND

Vasopressor agents could have certain specific effects in patients with cardiogenic shock (CS) after myocardial infarction, which may influence outcome. Although norepinephrine and epinephrine are currently the most commonly used agents, no randomized trial has compared their effects, and intervention data are lacking.

OBJECTIVE

The goal of this paper was to compare in a prospective, double-blind, multicenter, randomized study, the efficacy and safety of epinephrine and norepinephrine in patients with CS after acute myocardial infarction.

METHODS

The primary efficacy outcome was cardiac index evolution, and the primary safety outcome was the occurrence of refractory CS. Refractory CS was defined as CS with sustained hypotension, end-organ hypoperfusion and hyperlactatemia, and high inotrope and vasopressor doses.

RESULTS

Fifty-seven patients were randomized into 2 study arms, epinephrine and norepinephrine. For the primary efficacy endpoint, cardiac index evolution was similar between the 2 groups (p = 0.43) from baseline (H0) to H72. For the main safety endpoint, the observed higher incidence of refractory shock in the epinephrine group (10 of 27 [37%] vs. norepinephrine 2 of 30 [7%]; p = 0.008) led to early termination of the study. Heart rate increased significantly with epinephrine from H2 to H24 while remaining unchanged with norepinephrine (p < 0.0001). Several metabolic changes were unfavorable to epinephrine compared with norepinephrine, including an increase in cardiac double product (p = 0.0002) and lactic acidosis from H2 to H24 (p < 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with CS secondary to acute myocardial infarction, the use of epinephrine compared with norepinephrine was associated with similar effects on arterial pressure and cardiac index and a higher incidence of refractory shock. (Study Comparing the Efficacy and Tolerability of Epinephrine and Norepinephrine in Cardiogenic Shock [OptimaCC]; NCT01367743).

Pridružite se našoj
facebook stranici

Najkompletnija baza ljekovitog bilja potpomognuta znanošću

  • Radi na 55 jezika
  • Biljni lijekovi potpomognuti znanošću
  • Prepoznavanje bilja slikom
  • Interaktivna GPS karta - označite bilje na mjestu (uskoro)
  • Pročitajte znanstvene publikacije povezane s vašom pretragom
  • Pretražite ljekovito bilje po učincima
  • Organizirajte svoje interese i budite u toku s istraživanjem vijesti, kliničkim ispitivanjima i patentima

Upišite simptom ili bolest i pročitajte o biljkama koje bi mogle pomoći, unesite travu i pogledajte bolesti i simptome protiv kojih se koristi.
* Svi podaci temelje se na objavljenim znanstvenim istraživanjima

Google Play badgeApp Store badge